http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/25/required-camera-resolution-for-photography-through-the-microscope/ of Microscopy, Microbes and More Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:12:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/25/required-camera-resolution-for-photography-through-the-microscope/comment-page-1/#comment-1979 Laurent Delvoye Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:11:02 +0000 http://www.microbehunter.com/?p=1482#comment-1979 Hello Oliver, The matter of camera MPs may be more complicated than you presented with your comparison photographs. I made exposures of the same subject on my Orthoplan with a Canon EOS 300D body (6.3 MP) and a Canon Eos 50D body (18 MP). In both instances the same Leitz Leica adapter with a LOMO K7 eyepiece was used. The differences are distinct! The 50D is better in every respect! I suspect (as I learned from amateur astronomical discussions), that the antialiasing (AA)filter placed in front of the sensor is the cause of these obvious differences. The "grain" of this AA-filter is finer in the 50D than in the 300D, hence the differences in image quality. Beste Regards Laurent Delvoye Hello Oliver,
The matter of camera MPs may be more complicated than you presented with your comparison photographs. I made exposures of the same subject on my Orthoplan with a Canon EOS 300D body (6.3 MP) and a Canon Eos 50D body (18 MP). In both instances the same Leitz Leica adapter with a LOMO K7 eyepiece was used. The differences are distinct! The 50D is better in every respect! I suspect (as I learned from amateur astronomical discussions), that the antialiasing (AA)filter placed in front of the sensor is the cause of these obvious differences. The “grain” of this AA-filter is finer in the
50D than in the 300D, hence the differences in image quality.
Beste Regards
Laurent Delvoye

]]> http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/25/required-camera-resolution-for-photography-through-the-microscope/comment-page-1/#comment-1642 Dennis Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:51:39 +0000 http://www.microbehunter.com/?p=1482#comment-1642 Hello Oliver! Very nice site you have. Just a suggestion. Instead of enlarging small image try reducing large one to the resolution of the small. This way you'll reduce noise in the image, while preserving resolution. We (amateur astrophotographers) use this a lot. Hello Oliver!
Very nice site you have. Just a suggestion. Instead of enlarging small image try reducing large one to the resolution of the small. This way you’ll reduce noise in the image, while preserving resolution. We (amateur astrophotographers) use this a lot.

]]>