Search found 161 matches
- Sun Jan 30, 2022 12:33 pm
- Forum: For forum members who want to buy and sell equipment
- Topic: LabCam for iPhone X / XS Withdrawn
- Replies: 0
- Views: 852
LabCam for iPhone X / XS Withdrawn
Withdrawn.
- Sat Jan 29, 2022 3:41 pm
- Forum: For forum members who want to buy and sell equipment
- Topic: Wanted: Olympus BH2-BHS (or similar BH2, etc.)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3147
Re: Wanted: Olympus BH2-BHS (or similar BH2, etc.)
Hello AALT
Where are you located?
I have a BHS with S-plan objectives plus phase kit but I'd prefer not to post.
Where are you located?
I have a BHS with S-plan objectives plus phase kit but I'd prefer not to post.
- Sun Nov 07, 2021 10:10 am
- Forum: Home-made microscope adaptations
- Topic: Slider for Motic BA310
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6353
Re: Slider for Motic BA310
Thanks, I am a little bit confused so I made a drawing: DF.jpg If I understand well, r1=11mm, I couldn't figure out r2 r3 and r4 from your previous message. I also have the central orange light issue but it goes away when I up the condenser to the max. You opened the condenser iris to the max right...
- Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:57 pm
- Forum: Home-made microscope adaptations
- Topic: Slider for Motic BA310
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6353
Re: Slider for Motic BA310
Awesome, may I bother you with the inner and outer diameters of the darkfield stop light hole? 22mm & 28mm. The stop is 26.5mm (there's a very fine piece of wire holding it in place) I'm getting more of a darkfield effect now but I'm seeing an unwanted circular patch of yellow colour. The condenser...
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 7:58 pm
- Forum: Camera systems and imaging
- Topic: Video Editing Software
- Replies: 50
- Views: 26999
Re: Video Editing Software
Another vote for Davinci Resolve free version.
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 7:28 pm
- Forum: Home-made microscope adaptations
- Topic: Slider for Motic BA310
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6353
Re: Slider for Motic BA310
Hope this helps...smollerthings wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 7:09 pmYou are welcome and thanks for the info, what is the height of the slider? The center hole is only 22mm? Interesting...
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 6:07 pm
- Forum: Home-made microscope adaptations
- Topic: Slider for Motic BA310
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6353
Re: Slider for Motic BA310
Hi David, So this is my understanding: Darkfield relies on light that hits the objects not from below but from the sides. So it doesn't really work for prepared slides that are perfectly flat. Things need to be 3 dimensional (I use it for pond life). Also, you need to fully open the condenser's iri...
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 4:06 pm
- Forum: Home-made microscope adaptations
- Topic: Slider for Motic BA310
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6353
Re: Slider for Motic BA310
Thanks both, The condenser was set up for kohler illumination but I have raised the condenser to the top (it was almost at the top anyway). The video starts with the slider at its brightfield stop, then I move the slider to the darkfield position, when the image is completely lost (black) then graua...
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:03 am
- Forum: Home-made microscope adaptations
- Topic: Slider for Motic BA310
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6353
Re: Slider for Motic BA310
What do you mean by the effect is barely noticeable? Do you mean the background is not dark but grey? At what magnification do you work at? Those condensers will do dark field until 20x well, 40x sometimes and won't do anything above. Have you centered your condenser? I mean that when the slider is...
- Wed Nov 03, 2021 7:55 pm
- Forum: Home-made microscope adaptations
- Topic: Slider for Motic BA310
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6353
Re: Slider for Motic BA310
I have the Motic slider in your link. I may be doing something wrong, but I'm not that impressed. When the slider 'clicks' into place, the darkfield effect is barely noticeable. I have to move the slider out of its 'correct' position to see any effect, and then the contrast is not what I hoped for. ...
- Thu Nov 26, 2020 8:22 pm
- Forum: Camera systems and imaging
- Topic: Swift 380T + dslr adapter
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4648
Re: Swift 380T + dslr adapter
If the first image is what you see through the eyepieces, then I would suggest there is something wrong with your setup, not related to camera/imaging.
I would expect to see much clearer, sharper images through the eyepieces.
I would expect to see much clearer, sharper images through the eyepieces.
- Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:28 am
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Depth of field
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3795
Re: Depth of field
I have been coveting Splan apo's, but as most of my observations involve 3D specimens, not so much now. The shallow depth of field also imposes stringent setup requirements, which can be challenging. Yet high magnification coupled with high numerical aperture (NA) is where the fine details are reve...
- Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:11 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Depth of field
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3795
Re: Depth of field
It’s somewhat counterintuitive, but the higher the power of the objective, the greater the depth-of-focus (at the film/sensor plane) even though the depth-of-field (at the subject plane) decreases dramatically. Indeed. I have been coveting Splan apo's, but as most of my observations involve 3D spec...
- Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:36 am
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Depth of field
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3795
Re: Depth of field
Good information, thank you.viktor j nilsson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:39 amYep, that is an inescapable optical property.
You can read more about the relationship between NA and depth of field here:
https://www.microscopyu.com/microscopy- ... h-of-focus
- Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:59 am
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Depth of field
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3795
Depth of field
I have been using a Motic BA310 with Motic's standard plan lenses. The 10x objective (for purpose of comparison) has an NA of 0.25. I have recently aquired an Olympus BHS with Splan oblectives. The NA of the Splan 10x is 0.30. Comparing the two, I notice that the resolution of the Olympus is greater...
- Thu Sep 03, 2020 6:13 am
- Forum: Pictures and Videos
- Topic: The best Camera for Photomicrography
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12590
Re: The best Camera for Photomicrography
Here’s a small crop from David’s image, for convenient reference: Thanks Michael, yes that's what I'm talking about. I downloaded one of the images from the >$10k Leica dedicated camera referred to in the article. Opening at 100%, I'm not seeing the noise or artifacts here, but sharpness & resolvin...
- Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:17 pm
- Forum: Pictures and Videos
- Topic: The best Camera for Photomicrography
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12590
Re: The best Camera for Photomicrography
David, Sorry to be a pest, but may I suggest that, for clarity, you identify the three images in your post ... They appear to be in reverse order compared to those on the web page. MichaelG. L to R Rising Sun D500 D800 The artifacts in the RS example do appear to be jagged diagonal lines as describ...
- Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:24 pm
- Forum: Pictures and Videos
- Topic: The best Camera for Photomicrography
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12590
Re: The best Camera for Photomicrography
P.S. __ With the greatest respect ... I find it difficult to accept the conclusion [on your web-page] from the analysis of the comparative images Agreed, of the comparative diatom images, the Rising Sun shows much better sharpness and detail than both DSLR examples. To follow up, I downloaded the f...
- Sun Aug 30, 2020 1:39 pm
- Forum: Pictures and Videos
- Topic: The best Camera for Photomicrography
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12590
Re: The best Camera for Photomicrography
Agreed, of the comparative diatom images, the Rising Sun shows much better sharpness and detail than both DSLR examples.
- Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:00 pm
- Forum: Camera systems and imaging
- Topic: iOS App for using iPhone as camera
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2576
Re: iOS App for using iPhone as camera
What features make this a microscope camera?
Manual focus, zoom, manual white balance etc. already available on apps eg. Moment
Manual focus, zoom, manual white balance etc. already available on apps eg. Moment
- Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:56 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Trinocular Projection Lenses for DSLRs
- Replies: 130
- Views: 37906
Re: Trinocular Projection Lenses for DSLRs
I think you may have chosen the one area where it’s questionable, David ... Most of the Nikon image looks much crisper to me, and I would posit that your sampled area is simply out-of-focus on the Nikon image [the rest of it being sufficiently good to make that obvious ... which is not the case on ...
- Sun Aug 09, 2020 1:57 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Trinocular Projection Lenses for DSLRs
- Replies: 130
- Views: 37906
Re: Trinocular Projection Lenses for DSLRs
I question how the Nikon image can be considered better in the first pair.
Details of the woody stem image:
Generic:
Nikon:
Details of the woody stem image:
Generic:
Nikon:
- Sun Aug 09, 2020 11:33 am
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Trinocular Projection Lenses for DSLRs
- Replies: 130
- Views: 37906
Re: Trinocular Projection Lenses for DSLRs
In the woody stem example there is a lot more detail in the generic objective than the Nikon.
In the second example (lily, non-parfocal) there is more detail with the Nikon than the generic.
Suggesting another variable (like focus) needs to be eliminated for an effective comparison.
In the second example (lily, non-parfocal) there is more detail with the Nikon than the generic.
Suggesting another variable (like focus) needs to be eliminated for an effective comparison.
- Wed Aug 05, 2020 2:43 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Photo tube adapter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12773
Re: Photo tube adapter
Surely Motic makes a standard (ocular) 23.3mm eyepiece that could be used with the Celestron. Have you asked about that? If they don’t, an Amscope or other modern Chinese made eyepiece is likely to give acceptable results. (No worse than the generic optics LabCam provides.) There's this one....? ht...
- Wed Aug 05, 2020 1:56 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Photo tube adapter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12773
Re: Photo tube adapter
Thanks John yes I understand but the dovetail on the top of the U-spt is 37mm and fits perfectly into th eMotic photo port (37.5mm approx).
The eBay item states 42mm so I don't think it will fit.
The eBay item states 42mm so I don't think it will fit.
- Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:55 am
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Photo tube adapter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12773
Re: Photo tube adapter
Hi, I wonder if this item would take you from the photoport (in your 1st posted image) to a c-mount to 'start-off' camera access? As alreadt said, your isn't an Olympus BX type port but a plain (i.e. without dovetail 'socket') socket that may take the linked-to adapter.... The Motic photo port does...
- Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:06 am
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Photo tube adapter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12773
Re: Photo tube adapter
Looks like a good result I will be interested to see photos from the LabCam MichaelG. This is my fallback in case the problem with the photo eyepiece described in the other thread cannot be resolved by Motic (no reply yet to dealer's enquiry). However, LabCam expensive and I am unimpressed with the...
- Tue Aug 04, 2020 8:53 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Photo tube adapter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12773
Re: Photo tube adapter
And yes, the image though a suspended eyepiece is sharp at approx. the same distance.
You should work for Labcam!
Thank you!
You should work for Labcam!
Thank you!
- Tue Aug 04, 2020 8:47 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Photo tube adapter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12773
Re: Photo tube adapter
If Motic designed their camera adapter in the same way that most other manufacturer's do, then yes, inserting the LabCam there should work. You have direct access to the location where the photo eyepiece sits, correct? Because if it is deep down inside a tube, the LabCam won't be able to rest in th...
- Tue Aug 04, 2020 7:28 pm
- Forum: Microscopes and optics
- Topic: Photo tube adapter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12773
Re: Photo tube adapter
By the way, the statement in the 1st post about Olympus BX having the same fitting is wrong. Please disregard!