My Arachnoidiscus

Here you can discuss sample and specimen preparation issues.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Charles
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:55 pm

My Arachnoidiscus

#1 Post by Charles » Sat May 09, 2020 7:41 pm

This is my Arachnoidiscus from a sample sent to me from Edmonds, WA. Sample was cleaned and mounted in Zrax about two years ago.

The Arachnoidiscus is one species of this type slide:
Slide2.jpg
Slide2.jpg (50.55 KiB) Viewed 1712 times
The view from the B&L Stereomicroscope at 4X:
4X.jpg
4X.jpg (62.23 KiB) Viewed 1712 times
One shot taken with a 25X Zeiss Neofluar and Canon Ti3
25X trimmed.jpg
25X trimmed.jpg (216.1 KiB) Viewed 1712 times
One shot taken with a 100X Zeiss Neofluar and Canon Ti3
100X.jpg
100X.jpg (211.67 KiB) Viewed 1712 times

DonSchaeffer
Posts: 885
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#2 Post by DonSchaeffer » Sat May 09, 2020 9:50 pm

amazing!

keithstout
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 9:35 pm

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#3 Post by keithstout » Mon May 11, 2020 3:15 pm

Whoa! I'm sold. Incredible images. I almost have all my goodies together. I can't wait to get started. Many thanks, Charles. You're doing such great work. Keith

Chris Dee
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:02 pm

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#4 Post by Chris Dee » Mon May 11, 2020 3:30 pm

Lovely oblique/brightfield images. I know DIC is often the desired method for these subjects, but I still much prefer this type of shot. Thanks for sharing.

Sabatini
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:09 am

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#5 Post by Sabatini » Thu May 14, 2020 5:24 pm

Great work

photomicro
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:28 am
Location: UK

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#6 Post by photomicro » Thu May 14, 2020 6:48 pm

Chris Dee wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:30 pm
Lovely oblique/brightfield images. I know DIC is often the desired method for these subjects, but I still much prefer this type of shot. Thanks for sharing.


I agree, I like this kind of method too. Perhaps it is because I don't have DIC at present, though I used to, but it does seem to work nicely with diatoms.



This (below) is Arachnoidiscus japonicas, from an old Watson slide.



A. japonicus.jpg
A. japonicus.jpg (321.82 KiB) Viewed 1536 times

User avatar
75RR
Posts: 7494
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:34 am
Location: Estepona, Spain

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#7 Post by 75RR » Thu May 14, 2020 9:19 pm

Charles wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 7:41 pm
This is my Arachnoidiscus from a sample sent to me from Edmonds, WA. Sample was cleaned and mounted in Zrax about two years ago.
Misread your opening sentence. Thought at first that the slide was by Edmonds.

Only now did I realize that it was yours! Most impressive work, as can be judged by your image of Arachnoidiscus.

Consensus seems to be that your image is Oblique, it does however look like Brightfield to me. Perhaps you can let us know.
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)

User avatar
75RR
Posts: 7494
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:34 am
Location: Estepona, Spain

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#8 Post by 75RR » Thu May 14, 2020 9:23 pm

Nicely imaged grouping photomicro, what objective did you use?
Perhaps it is because I don't have DIC at present, though I used to ...
What is the story there? Upgrading to an infinity system?
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)

Charles
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:55 pm

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#9 Post by Charles » Fri May 15, 2020 12:36 am

75RR wrote:
Thu May 14, 2020 9:19 pm
Consensus seems to be that your image is Oblique, it does however look like Brightfield to me. Perhaps you can let us know.
Yes, both the 25X and 100X are oblique.

Thank you all.

photomicro
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:28 am
Location: UK

Re: My Arachnoidiscus

#10 Post by photomicro » Fri May 15, 2020 8:38 am

75RR wrote:
Thu May 14, 2020 9:23 pm
Nicely imaged grouping photomicro, what objective did you use?
Perhaps it is because I don't have DIC at present, though I used to ...
What is the story there? Upgrading to an infinity system?
Used a x20 objective. This is VAC, or variable amplitude contrast, which is easily made for any stand.

In terms of a story...yes there is. I had too many stands, though my main one(s) were Zeiss West, I was frustrated over time with de-lamination. So, I got rid of all my stands except one make (but with one other for sentimental reasons) which meant losing all the Zeiss, and DIC capability. In truth, being the initial Zeiss common slider system, it was never as good as the sort of thing we see now.

The make I am sticking with is Nikon, though by chance rather than planning, I have 160 and infinity !

Mike

Post Reply