What makes a microscope collectible?
What makes a microscope collectible?
I have always had a strong interest in science with microscopy being one of the areas of interest.
On occasion I come across instruments that seem to priced rather high.. field scopes and brass/black scopes come to mind.
In the past I found that scopes followed me home..but for their capabilities rather than for uniqueness or investment potential.
So a question for the group… what makes a microscope collectible?
Looking forward to your comments.
Thanks
On occasion I come across instruments that seem to priced rather high.. field scopes and brass/black scopes come to mind.
In the past I found that scopes followed me home..but for their capabilities rather than for uniqueness or investment potential.
So a question for the group… what makes a microscope collectible?
Looking forward to your comments.
Thanks
Re: What makes a microscope collectible?
Collectors.
-
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:09 pm
Re: What makes a microscope collectible?
I like old gem microscopes. I like them because they are functional pieces of gemological history, a tangible connection with a past ge eration and an older era, and they are nifty.
-
- Posts: 6353
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am
Re: What makes a microscope collectible?
Hahaha, apo……
I oftentimes have use for rare vintage microscopy parts, though I hate paying collector prices or bid against real collectors. I also don’t have easy access to 3D printing and don’t have much resources for extensive DIY. Buying vintage parts at reasonable prices is my best bet.
So for me, it is oftentimes about how to avoid paying collector prices for the rare vintage microscopy parts that I want.
I am fortunate in that apochronaut and a few other microscopists have kindly helped me many times in my searches.
I would still want a reverse condenser iris and an objective nose (Davis) shutter, if anyone wants to offload them at good prices together they can produce poor man’s DIC effect for cheap.
I oftentimes have use for rare vintage microscopy parts, though I hate paying collector prices or bid against real collectors. I also don’t have easy access to 3D printing and don’t have much resources for extensive DIY. Buying vintage parts at reasonable prices is my best bet.
So for me, it is oftentimes about how to avoid paying collector prices for the rare vintage microscopy parts that I want.
I am fortunate in that apochronaut and a few other microscopists have kindly helped me many times in my searches.
I would still want a reverse condenser iris and an objective nose (Davis) shutter, if anyone wants to offload them at good prices together they can produce poor man’s DIC effect for cheap.
Re: What makes a microscope collectible?
In my case the microscopes i collected were those I encountered along the way. I will admit to purchasing a couple that would have never crossed my day-to-day path, but were interesting in one way or another. I have a couple from the colleges I attended (I did not steal them) and the one I used at my first real job. Each one holds a small memory of something or someone.
lorez
lorez
Nikon 80i
-
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:29 am
- Location: Georgia, USA
Re: What makes a microscope collectible?
If it's in good shape and has all its original parts, so none in my collection
1942 Bausch and Lomb Series T Dynoptic, Custom Illumination
-
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2022 3:44 pm
Re: What makes a microscope collectible?
I can't get my hands on anything "collectible". There always seems to be a security guard nearby eyeing me suspiciously.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2019 3:54 pm
Re: What makes a microscope collectible?
The short answer is "whatever you want it to be"
I have a small collection of vintage microscopes. My best microscope is a Seibert (the precursor to Leitz) probably manufactured around 1900 or before. It is a superb example of Victorian/Edwardian period precision. The brass fitiings, etc are all made to a level of precision that is surprising to me, even today. The scope has three objectives and two different eyepieces. Although the optics hace deteriorated over the last 120+ years, one of the objectives seems to have survided the ravages of time. Optically the image quality is superb although at that time I guess flat field objectives were not yet produced. One of the objectives is an oil immersion so the limits of light transmission must have been known.
The other microscopes in my collection are the entry level low to high end amateur microscopes from Lafayette Radio and Electronics from the late 1950's. The microscopes were all manufactured in Japan by a few microscope makers and rebranded. Image quality is decent considering the cost and were superior to many onf the toy microscopes that were being made available. Although not of the precison and quality of the vintage microscope, I consider them to be collectable because of the high impact they had when introduced. Literally thousand of them were available.
I have a small collection of vintage microscopes. My best microscope is a Seibert (the precursor to Leitz) probably manufactured around 1900 or before. It is a superb example of Victorian/Edwardian period precision. The brass fitiings, etc are all made to a level of precision that is surprising to me, even today. The scope has three objectives and two different eyepieces. Although the optics hace deteriorated over the last 120+ years, one of the objectives seems to have survided the ravages of time. Optically the image quality is superb although at that time I guess flat field objectives were not yet produced. One of the objectives is an oil immersion so the limits of light transmission must have been known.
The other microscopes in my collection are the entry level low to high end amateur microscopes from Lafayette Radio and Electronics from the late 1950's. The microscopes were all manufactured in Japan by a few microscope makers and rebranded. Image quality is decent considering the cost and were superior to many onf the toy microscopes that were being made available. Although not of the precison and quality of the vintage microscope, I consider them to be collectable because of the high impact they had when introduced. Literally thousand of them were available.