I found these two specimens in a sample from the reed beds in a local freshwater pond. One seems to have some similarities to a pair of diatoms , but unlike any I've seen before, the pair is 60um wide and 75 long, it was taken at 20x 0.46NA . The other image was taken at 40x 0.95 NA and was moving slowly but with no evidence of flagella or cilia, it was 190 x 130 um.. Any suggestions about their ID would be most welcome.
Thanks
Michael
Help needed identifying two specimens
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 4:29 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, BC, Canada
Help needed identifying two specimens
- Attachments
-
- PossibleDiatom20x.jpg (101.43 KiB) Viewed 2445 times
-
- 90D_1938_40XB.jpg (207.95 KiB) Viewed 2445 times
Olympus BH2,
AO110
Carl Zeiss Standard WL
Canon 90D
AO110
Carl Zeiss Standard WL
Canon 90D
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:21 pm
- Location: Kalwa, Thane, Maharashtra, India
- Contact:
Re: Help needed identifying two specimens
Hi mike, I've come across the oval shaped organism too while scanning moss samples on my lil water bear hunt.MikeBradley wrote: ↑Wed Aug 19, 2020 4:41 amI found these two specimens in a sample from the reed beds in a local freshwater pond. One seems to have some similarities to a pair of diatoms , but unlike any I've seen before, the pair is 60um wide and 75 long, it was taken at 20x 0.46NA . The other image was taken at 40x 0.95 NA and was moving slowly but with no evidence of flagella or cilia, it was 190 x 130 um.. Any suggestions about their ID would be most welcome.
Thanks
Michael
Not sure what those are.. would really like to know
Shawn P.
Re: Help needed identifying two specimens
Not sure if you will find this comment helpful but my first reaction was crustacean body part,MikeBradley wrote: ↑Wed Aug 19, 2020 4:41 amI found these two specimens in a sample from the reed beds in a local freshwater pond. One seems to have some similarities to a pair of diatoms , but unlike any I've seen before, the pair is 60um wide and 75 long, it was taken at 20x 0.46NA .
did a little searching and came up with Aulacoseira sp. which at first sight looked potentially promising.
There are however two problems, firstly size, these are very small diatoms.
Secondly the cells are joined using the spines, think interlocking fingers, while your image has spines in each section facing the same way.
Much like a crustacean in fact.
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 4:29 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, BC, Canada
Re: Help needed identifying two specimens
Thanks for the suggestion 75RR, I'm now thinking that that image may well be from a branchiopod body part or perhaps part of a larval casing. I'll keep looking!
I did take look at Aulacoseira sp. and that was a very interesting and informative diversion from my quest, thanks for the idea.
I haven't had any ideas about the second image so far and I've now found more examples of these in a sample so that investigation must continue.
Michael
I did take look at Aulacoseira sp. and that was a very interesting and informative diversion from my quest, thanks for the idea.
I haven't had any ideas about the second image so far and I've now found more examples of these in a sample so that investigation must continue.
Michael
Olympus BH2,
AO110
Carl Zeiss Standard WL
Canon 90D
AO110
Carl Zeiss Standard WL
Canon 90D
-
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:06 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Re: Help needed identifying two specimens
The mysterious part is that the specimen looks like it has children's drawings or aboriginal drawings scrawled on it.