No.0 cover slip

Here you can discuss all microscopy-related accessories and equipment (microtomes, filters...)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
McConkey
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:33 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

No.0 cover slip

#1 Post by McConkey » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:58 pm

I was wondering if anyone has a suggestion as to where I can get some No.0 cover slips. Any suppliers anyone would like to recommend. Not having much luck on eBay or Amazon.

Thanks in advance!
Karl
AO21 with Canon M3

User avatar
75RR
Posts: 8207
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:34 am
Location: Estepona, Spain

Re: No.0 cover slip

#2 Post by 75RR » Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:31 pm

Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)

User avatar
McConkey
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:33 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: No.0 cover slip

#3 Post by McConkey » Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:53 am

Thank you!
Karl
AO21 with Canon M3

apochronaut
Posts: 6272
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: No.0 cover slip

#4 Post by apochronaut » Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:17 pm

By the time the shipping to Canada is added in, a one ounce box of coverslips from Ted Pella gets to be pretty expensive. Ebay is a much better option. Almost every size and description shows up.

billbillt
Posts: 2895
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: No.0 cover slip

#5 Post by billbillt » Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:35 pm

apochronaut wrote:By the time the shipping to Canada is added in, a one ounce box of coverslips from Ted Pella gets to be pretty expensive. Ebay is a much better option. Almost every size and description shows up.
You might want to check that again.. A search on Ebay shows only one listing for a size "0" cover slip, and they list for $60+....

BillT

User avatar
McConkey
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:33 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: No.0 cover slip

#6 Post by McConkey » Tue Aug 02, 2016 6:00 pm

I do find it strange that No.0 cover slips are not as easily available as all the other sizes.
Karl
AO21 with Canon M3

apochronaut
Posts: 6272
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: No.0 cover slip

#7 Post by apochronaut » Tue Aug 02, 2016 6:35 pm

A lot of microscopy is done with very thin smears or sections and with objective lenses that are not overly demanding . This is the reason that 40x .65 high dry objectives have become the de facto objective on off the shelf microscope systems. They combine enough resolution capability to be able to tolerate 15X eyepieces and with a degree of flexibility, when it comes to sample thickness. Generally speaking, a sample of .20 um or so doesn't cross the border with such an objective. If it was a 40X .85 , or 60X .85 there would be problems, yet with a more refined sample preparation and a total sample thickness down around .17, you will get better imaging.
With specialized contrast techniques , such as phase, DF, DIC, Hoffman ; the sample thickness becomes more critical, so zero coverslips can help counteract that issue but you are still laying a thin high refractive index substance over a thicker low refractive index substance , usually to obtain a target sample thickness, when the actual spec. is a thicker high refractive index substance over a thiner low refractive index substance.
The combination of n's will cause slightly differing results; moreso with higher N.A. objectives, less with the workhorse 40X .65 combination and a little worse with specialized imaging techniques.
I have a few thin covers around, down as low as .07 but I find that I seldom need much below .12 and quite often use .14 or so as a default.

User avatar
zzffnn
Posts: 3200
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 3:57 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: No.0 cover slip

#8 Post by zzffnn » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:22 pm

0.14 mm cover slip sounds about right for live water mount, which is usually around 0.04 mm thick (yes, I have measured it before).

Post Reply