Polarized light and retardation plates doubt

Do you have any microscopy questions, which you are afraid to ask? This is your place.
Post Reply
Message
Author
martinprieto
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 11:31 am

Polarized light and retardation plates doubt

#1 Post by martinprieto » Fri Dec 20, 2019 10:40 am

Hello,
I've been wondering if there is any difference between placing retardation plates between polarizer and condenser or between the objective and the analyzer, so I tried both and I have not seen a difference.
I've seen that they are usually placed between the objective and the analyzer but my logic tells me that it should be better for image quality not to place it there. So, Does anyone know the reason to use this setup? I'm sure there must be some...
Thanks in advance for your answers.

wstenberg
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2017 6:11 pm
Location: Dallas TX
Contact:

Re: Polarized light and retardation plates doubt

#2 Post by wstenberg » Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:42 pm

OK, I don't know the answer, but at least one of my Zeiss condensers has a slot for a retardation plate. I have never actually tried to use it. Maybe I will experiment with it.
I think image quality would be the same, as long as the plate is not coincident with the specimen conjugate plane. I'm interested to hear what others have to say.
William
Astoria, Oregon

Zeiss Axiomat
Zeiss Stereomikroskop
Zeiss Tessovar

Post Reply