question about the difference background of phase contrast

Here you can discuss different microscopic techniques and illumination methods, such as Brightfield, Darkfield, Phase Contrast, DIC, Oblique illumination, etc.
Post Reply
Message
Author
92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

question about the difference background of phase contrast

#1 Post by 92111 » Wed Nov 21, 2018 5:05 am

why my phase contrast background is so bright
but somebody's phase contrast background is so dark?
because Positive and Negative Phase Contrast ?
or Polarizing phase contrast and no polarizing light.
_____________________________________________
my phase contrast
Image
somebody'phase contrast
Attachments
无标题.png
无标题.png (491.11 KiB) Viewed 14984 times

User avatar
75RR
Posts: 8207
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:34 am
Location: Estepona, Spain

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#2 Post by 75RR » Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:34 am

Remind us of your setup and the steps you are taking to achieve Phase Contrast
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)

User avatar
ImperatorRex
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:12 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#3 Post by ImperatorRex » Wed Nov 21, 2018 5:01 pm

I also would raise same question as 75RR, respectively if you have checked that the anular aperture ("light ring") of the condenser was centered to the objective phase ring?

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#4 Post by 92111 » Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:05 pm

hi.i am not at home for few days

apochronaut
Posts: 6327
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#5 Post by apochronaut » Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:52 pm

Phase contrast isn't one specific type of contrast enhancement. It is a group of similar effects on a continuum. Most companies that make only one type of phase, make what is referred to as a dark phase and usually with medium contrast.
The problem image shown here, seems to be shifted more towards a bright phase contrast but it also lacks definition. Knowing more about what the system is you are using and how you have set it up would help us to help you.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#6 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 7:36 am

This is my equipment.

i suspect my condenser has a problem.the diaphragm and the top lens are not in a line.1 and 2...
A and B centering phase ring____C and D centering diaphragm .
Attachments
IMG_20181122_094446067_HDR.jpg
IMG_20181122_094446067_HDR.jpg (306.42 KiB) Viewed 14885 times
IMG_20181122_095002735_HDR.jpg
IMG_20181122_095002735_HDR.jpg (354.96 KiB) Viewed 14885 times
IMG_20181122_095439899_HDR.jpg
IMG_20181122_095439899_HDR.jpg (353.98 KiB) Viewed 14885 times
IMG_20181122_145633329_HDR.jpg
IMG_20181122_145633329_HDR.jpg (341.35 KiB) Viewed 14885 times
1  and 2 not in a line
1 and 2 not in a line
IMG_20181122_145805430_HDR.jpg (296.6 KiB) Viewed 14885 times
Last edited by 92111 on Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#7 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:16 am

i will write my step later

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#8 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:34 am

don‘t wait my step, my step is wrong.i am reading leitz manual now.

SHOULD i buy Phase Contrast Centering Telescope Eyepiece?????
i have no that .

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4287
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#9 Post by Hobbyst46 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:05 am

92111 wrote:SHOULD i buy Phase Contrast Centering Telescope Eyepiece?????i have no that .
I highly recommend you get one. I find it difficult to impossible to align the phase ring and condenser phase annulus without a centering telescope.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#10 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:06 am

step 1
centering the condenser:
diaphragm 1 close.diaphragm 2 open. conderser at H(BF)
Attachments
IMG_20181122_165136484.jpg
IMG_20181122_165136484.jpg (314.23 KiB) Viewed 14866 times
DSC01541.JPG
DSC01541.JPG (133.4 KiB) Viewed 14866 times

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4287
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#11 Post by Hobbyst46 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:11 am

So far so good. Is the objective 10X phase contrast?

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#12 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:18 am

STEP 2:
condenser at phaco one,objective 10
look from the eyepiece tube certering the phase ring.
or
open diaphragm 1,close diaphragm 2,move the blalck in the center.
Attachments
IMG_20181122_162353347_HDR.jpg
IMG_20181122_162353347_HDR.jpg (310.47 KiB) Viewed 14862 times
IMG_20181122_184443396.jpg
IMG_20181122_184443396.jpg (234.65 KiB) Viewed 14862 times

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#13 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:18 am

step 3
take photo
Attachments
DSC01543.JPG
DSC01543.JPG (165.52 KiB) Viewed 14861 times

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4287
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#14 Post by Hobbyst46 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:29 am

None.
Step 1 was OK. Step 2 needs to be this: Close diaphragm 1 as much as possible. Until the lit area is a small circle. Not what you did.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#15 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:31 am

detail of my condenser:
the phase ring ,one side is silver color,another side is black.
Attachments
2.jpg
2.jpg (258.62 KiB) Viewed 14855 times
1.jpg
1.jpg (327.83 KiB) Viewed 14855 times

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4287
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#16 Post by Hobbyst46 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:37 am

After step 1 as shown, I suggest that you proceed to step 2 - closing diaphragm 1 (this is the FIELD diaphragm on your inverted microscope) until you get a tiny circle.
Step 3 will be centering that circle, with the condenser centering thumb screws. While doing it, verify that the field diaphragm is at focus. If it is not, raise or lower the condenser ever so slightly until it is focused.
Step 4 will be OPEN the field diaphragm such that the field of view is illuminated, just to the rim, not beyond that.

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4287
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#17 Post by Hobbyst46 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:50 am

After step 4 your illumination is in proper Kohler adjustment (assuming that the light source is compatible).
Step 5 - rotate the condenser turret until the PH1 (or Phaco 1 if this is the Leitz terminology) is in the light path.
Step 6 - remove the eyepiece and inspect the bright ring and dark ring that should be visible down the eyepiece tube (that is the back focal plane of the objective). Then, you can align them with the PHASE ALIGNMENT HANDLES/KNOBS of the condenser - NOT the centering thumbscrews!! This I suggest to do although I do not know where thses knobs are on the Leitz condenser.
Good luck!

Step 6 is where a phase telescope will facilitate the operation.

P.S. If, to give us a view of the phase element in the condenser, you temporarily removed the front lens of the condenser, return it! it should be fitted in place for the 10X objective!

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#18 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:02 pm

Hobbyst46 wrote:None.
Step 1 was OK. Step 2 needs to be this: Close diaphragm 1 as much as possible. Until the lit area is a small circle. Not what you did.
thanks .i need time to try

apochronaut
Posts: 6327
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#19 Post by apochronaut » Thu Nov 22, 2018 4:20 pm

92111 wrote:step 1
centering the condenser:
diaphragm 1 close.diaphragm 2 open. conderser at H(BF)
One small problem, not immense but worth attending to is that the condenser plane is not parallel with the objective plane. The image of your iris has yellow c.a. on one side and blue c.a. on the other. The iris is tipped slightly.....not good if the annulus is tipped likewise.

Brad_
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 3:35 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#20 Post by Brad_ » Thu Nov 22, 2018 6:09 pm

You seem to have one too many condensers on your microscope. The
402a condenser is a "normal" working distance condenser, made to
work on a 170 mm upright scope...not at all useful on an inverted
scope. The tube that has "diaphram 1" is likely the proper
condenser for the scope.

There's problems with the objectives. The 10x will work well
but must be used with 170 TL eyepieces. Same with the 20x. The
40x LWD is a spiffy objective for your scope, but must be used
with 160 TL eyepieces The other two flutars, while fine lenses,
have little, if any, value on an inverted scope.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#21 Post by 92111 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 8:10 pm

Brad_ wrote:You seem to have one too many condensers on your microscope. The
402a condenser is a "normal" working distance condenser, made to
work on a 170 mm upright scope...not at all useful on an inverted
scope. The tube that has "diaphram 1" is likely the proper
condenser for the scope.

There's problems with the objectives. The 10x will work well
but must be used with 170 TL eyepieces. Same with the 20x. The
40x LWD is a spiffy objective for your scope, but must be used
with 160 TL eyepieces The other two flutars, while fine lenses,
have little, if any, value on an inverted scope.
Hi, I am sleeping .Yes two condensers . read leitz divert mannual.there are two condensers in it.5 objectives are all phases contrast .All working with 0.17mm slider.

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4287
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#22 Post by Hobbyst46 » Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:07 pm

Hi 92111,

Limiting my comment to the illumination and phase setting issues only:

Indeed, the Diavert Manual tells that one can do phase contrast with both condensers, No 91 and series 400, installed on the microscope. Together they provide phase contrast with objectives 6.3X and up, and Kohler illumination as detailed in the steps suggested in my previous response above. And the instructions for phase rings alignment are also the same as in the response above - with one small difference:

The manual tells you to set Kohler illumination directly with the phase contrast condenser position Phaco 1, instead of the brightfield position (that you had started in Step 1, and I suggested to proceed with it). My previous experience with Zeiss and Olympus microscopes is that initial Kohler setting, when done on the brightfield position, is convenient and sufficient as preliminary to the phase ring alignment. Perhaps on other condensers it is better to set Kohler directly on the condenser in the Phaco 1 position.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#23 Post by 92111 » Fri Nov 23, 2018 1:07 am

thanks everyone.i found there are many place need i adjust.such as i should adjust 4 Screws in the red circle to make the condenser vertical .i even need adjust the objective turret. i have ever disassemble this microscope to clean the lens inside so many position changed.
Attachments
捕获.PNG
捕获.PNG (316.61 KiB) Viewed 14750 times

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#24 Post by 92111 » Fri Nov 23, 2018 2:04 am

bought a chinese CT CENTERING TELESCOPE MICROSCOPE EYEPIECE .
Attachments
s-l1600.jpg
s-l1600.jpg (26.68 KiB) Viewed 14744 times

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#25 Post by 92111 » Tue Dec 11, 2018 11:49 am

Brad_ wrote:You seem to have one too many condensers on your microscope. .
HI ,i found you are right ,i read leitz diavert Manual again,i found i can't use two condenser at same time,that will make me fail in Hobbyst46's step 2.
i am busy in my camera system,so reply late.

TareqPhoto
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2018 10:49 pm
Location: Ajman

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#26 Post by TareqPhoto » Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:14 pm

Reply wit your new finding out, let us know, and show examples please, i was planning to buy a Phase Contrast kit, but if it won't help much then i won't bother to buy one.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#27 Post by 92111 » Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:52 am

TareqPhoto wrote:Reply wit your new finding out, let us know, and show examples please, i was planning to buy a Phase Contrast kit, but if it won't help much then i won't bother to buy one.
Big Sorry TareqPhoto.
my microscope can't work now.i never test that kit after I bought it.
if you can buy it anytime.don't buy.
I need 7-----30days to repair my microscope.

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#28 Post by 92111 » Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:45 pm

TareqPhoto wrote:Reply wit your new finding out, let us know, and show examples please, i was planning to buy a Phase Contrast kit, but if it won't help much then i won't bother to buy one.
Hi TareqPhoto!!!!
without telescope,you can't fully centre the phase ring.but can't tell the difference between fully centred and not fully centred.show you two vedio.
not fully centredhttps://youtu.be/C9_nn6FbF7E
fully centredhttps://youtu.be/m8VR32FeKTs

i baught this chinese telescope for 120/7 Dollar。it works well on my leitz diavert.show you some picture
Attachments
@0]1}(BB%N%G`CW[FY)WW0K.png
@0]1}(BB%N%G`CW[FY)WW0K.png (416.52 KiB) Viewed 13779 times
IMG_20190107_205433570.jpg
IMG_20190107_205433570.jpg (319.45 KiB) Viewed 13779 times
IMG_20190107_205420448.jpg
IMG_20190107_205420448.jpg (299.38 KiB) Viewed 13779 times

92111
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 8:45 am

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#29 Post by 92111 » Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:48 pm

finally,i find my leitz diavert can use two condenser at same time

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4287
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: question about the difference background of phase contrast

#30 Post by Hobbyst46 » Mon Jan 07, 2019 3:13 pm

92111 wrote:finally,i find my leitz diavert can use two condenser at same time
Sure, this is what the manual states! Now that you have a phase telescope all phase settings will be easier. Moreover, you can now experiment and see what the iris and field condensers do.

Post Reply