https://www.ebay.it/itm/MICROSCOPE-OBJE ... cvip-panel
10 X HCX PL S-APO, OPENING NUMERIC 0.30, M25 ATTACHMENT,
Just bought this one because of the very attractive price .
It is infinity/- objective.
But then now i have a doubt..what mean the "S" in front of Apo ?
Edit:
I see that it is a Semi Apo objective..probably this explain lower price.
isn't this a good deal for a Leica microscope ?
Re: isn't this a good deal for a Leica microscope ?
Marco from Italy/Torino
Leica DMLS microscope with 4x, 10x, 40x, 100x
Leica DMLS microscope with 4x, 10x, 40x, 100x
-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am
Re: isn't this a good deal for a Leica microscope ?
Semi-apochromats are usually what used to be called fluorites. Natural fluorite crystals used to be the source of the low dispersion glass, needed. For some years, other synthetic glass has been developed that mimics fluorite's capability , although some companies such as Canon grow synthetic fluorite crystals.
Fluorites are usually somewhere between an achromat and an apo in colour correction, although some are surprisingly good .
Leica lists Fluotars, which are their old proprietary name for their fluorite objectives as well as Pl S-Apos. This follows along the path that Reichert took way back in the 1980's, where they had a parallel line of objectives, Plan Apos and then Plan Fluor Apos. There is a difference in them, noticeable but subtle. I'm not surre what the cost breakdown was on them when new. I've always figured that Leica used tweaked Reichert formulas for that class of objectives, because they were better than their Fluotar formulas. A similar Reichert one would be about 150.00 used. Actually, a Reichert Plan Apo would be not much more + 25.00 for adapters or so.
Fluorites are usually somewhere between an achromat and an apo in colour correction, although some are surprisingly good .
Leica lists Fluotars, which are their old proprietary name for their fluorite objectives as well as Pl S-Apos. This follows along the path that Reichert took way back in the 1980's, where they had a parallel line of objectives, Plan Apos and then Plan Fluor Apos. There is a difference in them, noticeable but subtle. I'm not surre what the cost breakdown was on them when new. I've always figured that Leica used tweaked Reichert formulas for that class of objectives, because they were better than their Fluotar formulas. A similar Reichert one would be about 150.00 used. Actually, a Reichert Plan Apo would be not much more + 25.00 for adapters or so.