I just joined this forum

Many thanks
Louise
Could you post a photo of it? Just curious.I've had an oldish unbranded trinocular scope since the '90s which I've upgraded to plan objectives.
on-line reviews aren't exactly where I go go for information.Scarodactyl wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:18 pmHave you seen good reviews of Radical scopes overall? I have only seen one iirc, but it was very negative.
I would not lend any credence to the 1µm claim from euromex.I was wondering - would there be any practical difference between a claimed 1um focus sensitivity (Euromex) and a 2um sensitivity (Motic)?
I am saying that the quality of the big 4 research microscopes from the 160 tube length era is superior.That would suggest that new Euromex or Motic are poor quality?
You have to look at it from the standpoint of what you are looking for and what you are getting in terms of features for your £. You have an interest in phase contrast and are concerned about the relative precision of a 1 micron fine focus compared to a 2 micron fine focus. That's primarily what I see. I think you are more concerned about the proximity of the dealer, or some kind of security related to the purchase , though. I can sell you a used 4 objective phase contrast microscope with 4 extra bright field objectives and a trinocular head in immaculate condition for 800.00, shipped to England . It will still be working well after the Motic or Brunel or Euromex microscopes are in the dumpster but would you go for that? I think not.LouiseScot wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 10:59 pm"£2000 is a very generous budget within the used microscope market, and I mean very generous!
You can get a good quality used microscope with phase for less than half that with a little patience."
That would suggest that new Euromex or Motic are poor quality? My current one was relatively cheap but has served me well.
Louise
Of course, a 'big 4' scope is going to be better quality - as you say 'superior'. I have looked online and on Ebay but haven't seen anything affordable. Plus there's a risk in buying second hand. At the end of the day, I just want something affordable and useable. At my (old!) age it will probably only have to last me about 10 years max. Still, I'm looking at various options. I'll be keeping my current scope so a second scope will be an additional instrument. I'll maybe keep the current one for brightfield and darkfield, the newer one for dedicated phase contrast. I have experience of using an Olympus (and other makes) over the years so I know the difference in optical and mechanical quality. This is the BX50WI I used to use on a more or less daily basis. It's fitted with IR DIC and Epifluorescence:75RR wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:48 amI am saying that the quality of the big 4 research microscopes from the 160 tube length era is superior.That would suggest that new Euromex or Motic are poor quality?
Still, a used microscope is not for everyone. You should however look into it before deciding.
Have a read through this pdf: http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/art ... oscope.pdf
New members can receive but not sent PMs so you would need to include a means of contact.photomicro wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:03 pmHave sent PM, but not sure if you have been a member long enough.
I did send a reply - at least, it gave me the appearance of being sent!75RR wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:15 pmNew members can receive but not sent PMs so you would need to include a means of contact.photomicro wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:03 pmHave sent PM, but not sure if you have been a member long enough.
ps it seems to be sat in my Outbox. How long before I'm able to actually reply to a PM??LouiseScot wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:22 pmI did send a reply - at least, it gave me the appearance of being sent!75RR wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:15 pmNew members can receive but not sent PMs so you would need to include a means of contact.photomicro wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:03 pmHave sent PM, but not sure if you have been a member long enough.
Louise
I'm sorry but I wouldn't buy anything second hand from the States. I'd be nervous about buying second hand even within the UK. If I could see it first and try it out, that might be a different matter, but the chances of finding something I'd like that's close by are probably slim. I'd try my local Uni on the off chance, but I don't have any contacts there anymore and it's still pretty well shut for now anyway.Hobbyst46 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:35 pmHere is an example of an Olympus BH-2. With phase contrast. Just picked it out of eBay. I am not related to the seller in any way.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Olympus-Trinoc ... Swpq1fAnd7
With phase condenser and two SPlans (I am 99% sure), 40X and 100X phase. And very good eyepieces.
Price is negotiable. So even including taxes and shipping (well I do not know the shipping rate to the UK) it will cost less than 2000BP.
Add a 10X and 20X phase objective and it becomes a system - ignoring for the time being that phase contrast objectives are not the optimum for brightfield/darkfield.
The BH-2 is a fine microscope. The BX50 is not much better for hobby use.
Of course, the anti-vibration table and other accessories in the photo is a luxury in itself, but that goes with the lab...
Here is reply I sent:photomicro wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:03 pmHave sent PM, but not sure if you have been a member long enough.
Hi Daviddavid_b wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 6:18 amI had a Brunel microscope with plan objectives and decided to upgrade to a Motic BA310
I found that the change to 30mm eyepieces was a huge improvement in viewing comfort, but the Motic ojectives were no better than the generic Brunel objectives and in a direct comparison actually show more chromatic aberration.
.
ps it seems to be sat in my Outbox. How long before I'm able to actually reply to a PM??
Hi LouiseLouiseScot wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:10 pmHi David
I thought I'd replied to this earlier but maybe I didn't 'submit', d'uh. Anyway, I'd asked you what Motic objectives you have/had? Are they 'EC' Plan achromats?
They do 10x/22mm UC eyepieces and UC Plan objectives (optional Phase) for the Panthera. I asked Motic what the difference is. They said "The major difference is the Plan UC is a newer objective with better resolution and contrast, and it is used for Panthera series, while the Plan EC is for the BA series." Not very informative really. They are still achromats![]()
Louise
As I said, they claim the Panthera UC is 'higher contrast and resolution' compared to the EC objective.david_b wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:55 pmHi LouiseLouiseScot wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:10 pmHi David
I thought I'd replied to this earlier but maybe I didn't 'submit', d'uh. Anyway, I'd asked you what Motic objectives you have/had? Are they 'EC' Plan achromats?
They do 10x/22mm UC eyepieces and UC Plan objectives (optional Phase) for the Panthera. I asked Motic what the difference is. They said "The major difference is the Plan UC is a newer objective with better resolution and contrast, and it is used for Panthera series, while the Plan EC is for the BA series." Not very informative really. They are still achromats![]()
Louise
The Motic BA310 objectives are EC Plan. I'm afraid I don't know anything about the Panthera.
This is a test image produced with the Brunel plan objective.
https://ibb.co/1vKwP58
What is the Numerical Aperture of the 20x objective?LouiseScot wrote: ↑Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:57 pmI was just wondering about the use of infinity-corrected objectives in a finite tube? My old Brunel (above) has a 160mm tube length. I bought a x20 plan objective for it a while ago (all 4 are Plan now) but the one I received is marked as an infinity objective.