Haematococcus (using different lighting methods) [added short video]
Haematococcus (using different lighting methods) [added short video]
Haematococcus taken with a 40x objective using different illumination techniques: brightfield, oblique illumination, DIC, and cross-polarized light.
1. BF 2. Oblique
3. DIC 4. Pol
1, 2, and 4 are of the same cell.
Thanks to Crater Eddie for the water sample.
1. BF 2. Oblique
3. DIC 4. Pol
1, 2, and 4 are of the same cell.
Thanks to Crater Eddie for the water sample.
Last edited by gekko on Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods)
Superb photographs gekko. 2 and 3 show up the cytoplasmic strands wonderfully. Thanks for these.
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods)
All are good but number three is my favorite.
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods)
WOW!... Look too good to be real!... I also find number three to be my overall favorite...
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods)
#3 is my favorite too! Thank you, gekko! charlie guevara
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods)
Excellent idea to run a comparison test.
Gallant attempt from Brightfield (Aging character actor)
Very effective Oblique (Up and coming star)
Superior DIC (A list).
Pol is the dark horse here. (Hidden talent)
Gallant attempt from Brightfield (Aging character actor)
Very effective Oblique (Up and coming star)
Superior DIC (A list).
Pol is the dark horse here. (Hidden talent)
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods)
Many thanks to all!
IanW, I think phase-contrast is also excellent for Haematococcus (you may want to have a quick look at viewtopic.php?f=6&t=785 as an example of that). Unfortunately, those algae appear to prefer to have their flagella out of the plane of focus most of the time .
75RR, . I'm glad that you thought my oblique lighting was acceptable (I thought it didn't look too bad, but I wasn't sure).
IanW, I think phase-contrast is also excellent for Haematococcus (you may want to have a quick look at viewtopic.php?f=6&t=785 as an example of that). Unfortunately, those algae appear to prefer to have their flagella out of the plane of focus most of the time .
75RR, . I'm glad that you thought my oblique lighting was acceptable (I thought it didn't look too bad, but I wasn't sure).
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods) [added short video]
I discovered that I had taken a very short video of the Haematococcus under cross-polarized illumination, so I thought I'd added it in case anyone might be interested. Thanks for looking.
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods) [added short video]
That was short alright. Like the photos better but didn't expect movement from an algae.
I will have to look for bird baths in my neighborhood.
JimT
I will have to look for bird baths in my neighborhood.
JimT
Re: Haematococcus (using different lighting methods) [added short video]
Thank you. I think that was an accidental video. Didn't expect movement from algae? Sure you have: you even liked this one viewtopic.php?f=6&t=785JimT wrote:That was short alright. Like the photos better but didn't expect movement from an algae.
I will have to look for bird baths in my neighborhood.
JimT
And you've post very beautiful images of Euglena and Phacus, if I remember right and I bet those were moving too Yes, birdbaths are a great source of algae, especially the beautiful Haematococcus and rotifers, at least in my experience.