Rotifère

[vasselle]

Hello has all.
A small observation of this night.
Assembly(Editing) liquid glycerin.
Researcher Bino and MicroCam 3,0 MP.

Photo 1.
Objectif achro 60 X et fond clair.
Pano de 2 photos et assembler avec Microsoft ICE.

5154_filtered (Copier).jpg (248.07 KiB) Viewed 2334 times

Photo 2.
Objectif achro 60 X et éclairage oblique.
Pano de 2 photos et assembler avec Microsoft ICE.

5155_filtered (Copier).jpg (242.53 KiB) Viewed 2335 times

Photo 3.
Objectif achro 60 X et éclairage oblique.
Pano de 2 photos et assembler avec Microsoft ICE.

5156_filtered (Copier).jpg (270.95 KiB) Viewed 2335 times

Cordialement seb

[gekko]

Beautiful optical sections with excellent detail. I think such optical sections give a different view (probably better) than does a focus stack.

[vasselle]

Hello Gekko.
Thank you very much.
Yes I also think that sometimes it is better necessary to make than a single grip to see better details which one want to show on the specimen.
And three photos I these facts in panoramic view of two photos because he return not whole in the field.
Cordially seb

[vasselle]

En voici une autre.

Objectif Achro 60 X et éclairage oblique.

5160_filtered (Copier).jpg (220.99 KiB) Viewed 2324 times

Cordialement seb

[75RR]

Excellent sharpness and clarity. Great view of the eye in the last one.

I think such optical sections give a different view (probably better) than does a focus stack.

I think each one has its place, what is important is that each technique be able to show something that can not be seen clearly by the others, it is after all why they were created. I think sometimes we get carried away by pretty rather than practical.

[vasselle]

Hello has all.
Thank you very much.
Yes photos have was made in a single view(sight) to provide well to highlight the small details, as on the last photo or I was willing to show eye of Rotifère.
Cordially seb

[gekko]

Excellent sharpness and clarity. Great view of the eye in the last one.

I think such optical sections give a different view (probably better) than does a focus stack.

I think each one has its place, what is important is that each technique be able to show something that can not be seen clearly by the others, it is after all why they were created. I think sometimes we get carried away by pretty rather than practical.

I agree. I think my comment arose from sour grapes, as I think I can do optical sections (although not with oblique illumination!), but I know I cannot do focus stacks .