This first one is obviously an aphid. A side note...
Johann had posted some stack tests with Zerene, and had originally obtained a troublesome background (later resolved). It was because there was an exposure variation in the frames. I had exactly the same problem here. This was illuminated with electronic flash. Unfortunately not all flash units are consistent from exposure to exposure. The variation would probably go unnoticed with different scenes, but when stacking (especially with a soft or monochromatic background) it can cause real problems in the background of the stack. The solution here (as with Johann's test image) was to be sure that in the stacking preferences you selected to enable the program to correct for exposure variations.
This second image is the interior of a Geranium robertianum ("Herb Robert") flower. This was made from a 162 image stack.
The this third image is the interior of a Vinca minor (Periwinkle). These have a rather complex and fascinating "arrangement". This is a case where a stereo image really helps you to see the actual "geometry".
This forth one is of some wing scales on a day flying moth ...Green-banded Urania (Urania leilus).
It was taken with an Olympus 50/0.50 LMPlanFLN objective. The field area for this image is 0.3 x 0.45mm (0.012 x 0.018 inch). It was a 44 image stack. One thing I like about this is that we normally think of butterfly or moth winds as "flat", but at these magnifications you can see some interesting topography in a stereo.
This last image is a crab larva. Quite bizarre looking little creature. I have a very small plankton net (153 micron mesh) that I often cast out with a fishing pole to collect specimens. This marine specimen came from Puget Sound in Washington State. (47.58980532406678, -122.3795099436046 to be exact
) This is another case where the stereo really helps to show the unusual morphology. 
.
