Poor man's SEM

Here you can post pictures and videos to show others.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
cuxlander
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:13 pm

Poor man's SEM

#1 Post by cuxlander » Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:36 pm

Hello,

ths is the 169 µm high testate amoeba Planocarina (former Nebela) marginata obliquely illuminated:

Image

The shell is covered with scales which had been robbed from Euglypha and other foreign objects.
40x Neofluar, Stacked image, contrast and sharpness moderately enhanced.

Greetings,
Hans

User avatar
ImperatorRex
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:12 pm
Location: Germany, Karlsruhe
Contact:

Re: Poor man's SEM

#2 Post by ImperatorRex » Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:26 pm

Impessive Photo, so many details. Thank you very much Hans!

MichaelG.
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: NorthWest England

Re: Poor man's SEM

#3 Post by MichaelG. » Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:26 pm

A great photo of astonishing 'behaviour'

Thanks for sharing it.
MichaelG.
Too many 'projects'

charlie g
Posts: 1401
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:54 pm

Re: Poor man's SEM

#4 Post by charlie g » Mon Apr 16, 2018 9:12 pm

Minimalistically inspiring image on it's own, cuzlander...yet your specifics of it being a protist organism of 'tiny size' relative to we mrtozoans...well that enchants the aspects of this image so much further!

Are we to believe this tiny protozoan collected these assenblies of 'bits and pieces' from it's environment? Or did this amoeba somehow 'fashion collected objects'...the way metazoan wasps fashion a 'paper nest which has a repeating physical texture'..and nothing in the wasps locale looks like that textured 'hive paper'?

I sense simply drinking up your relatively 'flat two dimensional image' of this amoebae test ( amoba house!)...I sense that all the bits seem too similar to be: 'found objects'...I sense all the bits were 'fashioned/worked' after collection...to function as this 'anoebas house'.

This aspect of your quite minimalistic image capture..it suggests all the activities about tiny ant colony entrance domes...why the ant domes particles all same color/ same relative size?!

It's all in fun...but why do you term this post: "Poor man's SEM" ? If you didn't state this an amoeba's test...I'd think we were enjoying a flattened image of con-US / southwestern pottery pre-Colubus! thanks for sharing, Charlie guevara

GaryB
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:33 am

Re: Poor man's SEM

#5 Post by GaryB » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:12 am

I wonder if it builds it's house from the lifeless corpses of it's victims *shudders*

Great shot!

User avatar
cuxlander
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Poor man's SEM

#6 Post by cuxlander » Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:42 am

Thanks for your comments.

The collection and subsequent use of xenosomes, i.e. foreign materials for the reenforcement of testacea shells has frequently raised the question: May this already be called behaviour?

Many members of the Hyalospheniidae build their shells using recycled shell plates scavenged from other testate amoebae, mainly from euglyphids (a behaviour called Kleptosquamy), sometimes also including fragments of diatom frustules and heliozoan spines.

Here are some examples of Nebela scavenging Euglyphida:

Image Image

They store these objects in their shell, see top left in this example:

Image

... until the use them for the next generation test.

Here is another example of a Nebela with beautiful decoration.
Image

Very interesting organisms.

Cheers,
Hans

User avatar
cuxlander
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Poor man's SEM

#7 Post by cuxlander » Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:58 am

Addendum:

@ Charlie Guevara
All Hyalospheniidae are quite flat, see

Image

Hans

desertrat
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 1:06 am
Location: Idaho

Re: Poor man's SEM

#8 Post by desertrat » Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:52 pm

Having long been interested in ancient life, I seem to recall reading that testate amoebae are an ancient group, predating the Cambrian. A little Googling turned up a scientific paper about exceptionally well preserved testate amoebae in rocks that predate the Cambrian and even the Ediacaran. These fossils were found in the Grand Canyon of Arizona in rocks of Neoproterozoic age, around 750 million years old. Lots of SEM images and discussion.

http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/porter ... ll2000.pdf
Rick

A/O 10 Series Microstar
A/O 4 Series Microstar
A/O 4 Series Phasestar
A/O 4 Series Apostar
A/O Cycloptic Stereo
Several old monocular scopes in more or less decrepit but usable condition

User avatar
vasselle
Posts: 2763
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:32 pm
Location: France

Re: Poor man's SEM

#9 Post by vasselle » Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:11 pm

Bonjour
Superbes images
Merci pour le partage
Cordialement seb
Microscope Leitz Laborlux k
Boitier EOS 1200D + EOS 1100D

User avatar
cuxlander
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Poor man's SEM

#10 Post by cuxlander » Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:22 am

Hello @desertrat
a scientific paper
Thanks, I did not know this paper. Interesting that testate amoebae predated the Ediacarian. I have read somewhere that the filopodia (Eyglypha) are still considerably older than the arcellinida.

Also interesting that Testate amoebae have been successfully used as indicators of past changes in peatland hydrology and to reconstruct past environmental conditions. Abundant arcellinida indicate wet and rainy periods, while Euglyphids appear in dryer climatic conditions.

Greetings,
Hans

MichaelG.
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: NorthWest England

Re: Poor man's SEM

#11 Post by MichaelG. » Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:31 am

desertrat wrote:Lots of SEM images and discussion.

http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/porter ... ll2000.pdf
Many thanks for that link.

MichaelG.
Too many 'projects'

Post Reply