Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

Here you can post pictures and videos to show others.
Post Reply
Message
Author
itouchyou
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:22 pm

Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#1 Post by itouchyou » Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:38 pm

Pretty new to using my microscope, but I have an OMAX that I bought off ebay for about 300ish. So its OK quality I guess? I can see coccus and bacillus bacteria, but one of the growths in my agar plate I check I cant see or identify the microbes, because they are too small. I am not sure what they are. Can anyone explain what they might be, why they are so small, and how to correct this issue if possible? I'm going to try to attach an image of them. They are the grainy looking things. The growth on the agar plate is an opaque viscous looking growth.

This is on highest magnification.

Image

https://i.imgur.com/IOTbz9g.jpg

User avatar
75RR
Posts: 8207
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:34 am
Location: Estepona, Spain

Re: Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#2 Post by 75RR » Fri Jun 15, 2018 5:12 am

Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)

User avatar
mrsonchus
Posts: 4175
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:42 pm
Location: Cumbria, UK

Re: Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#3 Post by mrsonchus » Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:21 am

Hi 75'!
That's just about the best rationale & explanation of gram-staining that I've read - thanks for an excellent link old chap.

John B. :D
John B

apochronaut
Posts: 6269
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#4 Post by apochronaut » Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:39 am

The problem with the conventional tools used to identify and classify bacteria is that they are just that, conventional, and as such have evolved since the 19th century to identify conventional features and bacterial relationships that are known to exist, have been documented thousands of times and make up a large portion of the body of knowledge of bacterial morphology that has been developed over about 150 years of study. Most of this has been gleaned from light microscopy, the limits of which are well known.
Outside the sphere of influence of the large body of microbiologists, who adhere to a rather rigid view that a coccus is a coccus, a bacillus is a bacillus etc. is a growing, more cutting edge view of the bacterial world where a great many other morphologies and forms exist, even particulate and that these forms, appear to represent defense mechanisms allowing the species to maintain resistance and re-populate in the classic form at an opportune time. The simple fact too, is that those involved in the study of what have become known as atypical bacterial forms, have achieved the highest level of acclaim in their field, yet their work has only slightly rippled the general pool of thinking in that field. Bacteria can take on a bewildering array of shapes, sizes, and forms, either for purposes of reproduction , as evasion tactics or obviously for purposes not understood. Virtually all of the antibiotics of the various families that have come to be relied on and classed as essential medicines in todays pharmacology are derived from naturally occurring substances in the microbial world, usually from molds, which the bacterial species have many years of familiarity with. Bacteria have naturally occurring mechanisms of surviving those substances, mechanisms that have existed in the gene pool for hundreds of thousands of years, They develop resistance as a block, because those genetic traits rise to the surface under the onslaught of a concentration of a chemical they are in fact familiar with historically, not usually because there is a mutation. Mechanisms of resistance are numerous but include such things as the pumping of a chemical out of the cell, cell particulation, the shedding of cell walls, sporulation, biofilm formation, encystment, rapid relocation, formation of electron dense bodies or tissue sequestering and probably so may other mechanisms that it would make your head spin.

When a culture or a serum shows areas of uneven morphology, or a high degree of particulation, the cause could be due to sub microscopic( light microscopy) structures associated with bacterial species but not at the stage of a refined morphology yet. Microscopic tools such as fluorescence , phase or DF have been used in the past to shed some light on such small particles, which defy conventional staining, with some success. Lengthy culturing periods have also been used to more or less extract a strain from it's cloak. In one study by Gerald Domingue et.al. , it took 2 years of constant culturing to achieve a reversion to a classic morphological form, of a mutated Staph. Aureus strain that was synthesizing a human growth hormone like chemical in tumour sites. The culture was obtained from CWD contaminated serum collected from that site.
A couple of wikipedia entries for 2 notables of bacteriology which briefly explains where the field is going in the future.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Domingue

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lida_Holmes_Mattman

User avatar
wporter
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:18 pm
Location: United States

Re: Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#5 Post by wporter » Fri Jun 15, 2018 1:15 pm

Great links, 75 & Apo, thanks.

Itouchyou, if you're looking at the specimen at 'highest power', you should use oil immersion for much better imaging and observation. This would involve making a stained slide preparation of the bacteria, first, of course.

itouchyou
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:22 pm

Re: Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#6 Post by itouchyou » Fri Jun 15, 2018 6:03 pm

wporter wrote:Great links, 75 & Apo, thanks.

Itouchyou, if you're looking at the specimen at 'highest power', you should use oil immersion for much better imaging and observation. This would involve making a stained slide preparation of the bacteria, first, of course.
Thanks for mentioning oil immersion, and thanks everyone for the links and information. I will look up some videos on how to stain slides, and as it turns out the microscope that I bought already has an oil immersion lens, so I just ordered some oil for it. Hopefully doing all that will give some clear views of what these are.

What I dont understand though is that these seems to be much smaller than coccus bacteria, which I have observed under my microscope. How can there be smaller bacteria? Is there a possibility that it is not bacteria?

itouchyou
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:22 pm

Re: Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#7 Post by itouchyou » Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:01 pm

Heres a new image with iodine staining. I bought a staining kit as well, but it wont be here for a week, so I just got some iodine from walmart.

This is with a 40 lens

Image

Image

itouchyou
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:22 pm

Re: Trouble Identifying Microbes. (PIC)

#8 Post by itouchyou » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:22 pm

Looks like Saccharomyces yeah?

Post Reply