Something a little different
Something a little different
As I am getting fed up with blurred images whilst photographing living organisms in pond water, I decided to try a prepared slide (here one of Lotus pollen), and so am sharing the resulting photo here. Nice design for a tie or wallpaper perhaps:-)
DSC_0045_DxO by Fortesmentum, on Flickr
DSC_0045_DxO by Fortesmentum, on Flickr
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL
Re: Something a little different
Know what you mean. If they move I take a video.As I am getting fed up with blurred images whilst photographing living organisms in pond water, I decided to try a prepared slide ...
Which reminds me, I have to take up the flash project again.
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Re: Something a little different
Yes that is something I had begun working towards last year but neglected owing to the complexities getting the better of it:-)IanW wrote:Which reminds me, I have to take up the flash project again.
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL
Re: Something a little different
Maybe this simple flash setup could help out:75RR wrote:Know what you mean. If they move I take a video.As I am getting fed up with blurred images whilst photographing living organisms in pond water, I decided to try a prepared slide ...
Which reminds me, I have to take up the flash project again.
http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/ind ... flash.html
BillT
Re: Something a little different
Hello Bill and thanks. Yes I have tried something similar using a split prism instead of a mirror - it's rather hit and miss and of course not really providing for Koehler illumination. It also takes up a lot of space on the desk, and so I am thinking along the lines of channelling the flash through the light port - still not given it enough thought.
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL
Re: Something a little different
Lovely pollen microphoto!
Re: Something a little different
Hello Ian,
As you know, Kohler is not absolutely necessary for good microscopy.. A lot of lower cost stands, that still perform very well do not utilize it.. I personally like to try different appliances and configurations, regardless how unconventional they are, to find what suits me..
The Best,
BillT
As you know, Kohler is not absolutely necessary for good microscopy.. A lot of lower cost stands, that still perform very well do not utilize it.. I personally like to try different appliances and configurations, regardless how unconventional they are, to find what suits me..
The Best,
BillT
Re: Something a little different
Thanks Bill - I will keep that in mind.
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL
Re: Something a little different
Thank you:-)Hobbyst46 wrote:Lovely pollen microphoto!
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL
-
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am
Re: Something a little different
An additional problem with living organisms is the sample thickness many of them provide. An individual organism or matrix of organisms, either way , ends up requiring an objective with an unusual depth of field in order to visualize it accurately. Deep samples allow an undesirable amount of travel in the Z axis. Adding a .17 cover slip to that just makes matters worse, sometimes to the point where image quality suffers too. It is always wise to include the cover slip thickness as part of the sample thickness and with high magnification, especially oil immersion, to keep the sample as shallow as possible and the cover slip likewise. I use .10-.12 as a rule.
Properly prepared slides take this into account and many of the good ones, if , mic'ed will come out around in the .17 to .20 range.
Properly prepared slides take this into account and many of the good ones, if , mic'ed will come out around in the .17 to .20 range.