Something a little different

Here you can post pictures and videos to show others.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
IanW
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Lancashire England

Something a little different

#1 Post by IanW » Mon Feb 18, 2019 3:17 pm

As I am getting fed up with blurred images whilst photographing living organisms in pond water, I decided to try a prepared slide (here one of Lotus pollen), and so am sharing the resulting photo here. Nice design for a tie or wallpaper perhaps:-)

ImageDSC_0045_DxO by Fortesmentum, on Flickr
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL

User avatar
75RR
Posts: 8207
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:34 am
Location: Estepona, Spain

Re: Something a little different

#2 Post by 75RR » Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:46 pm

As I am getting fed up with blurred images whilst photographing living organisms in pond water, I decided to try a prepared slide ...
Know what you mean. If they move I take a video.

Which reminds me, I have to take up the flash project again.
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)

User avatar
IanW
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Lancashire England

Re: Something a little different

#3 Post by IanW » Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:52 pm

IanW wrote:Which reminds me, I have to take up the flash project again.
Yes that is something I had begun working towards last year but neglected owing to the complexities getting the better of it:-)
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL

billbillt
Posts: 2895
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: Something a little different

#4 Post by billbillt » Mon Feb 18, 2019 6:45 pm

75RR wrote:
As I am getting fed up with blurred images whilst photographing living organisms in pond water, I decided to try a prepared slide ...
Know what you mean. If they move I take a video.

Which reminds me, I have to take up the flash project again.
Maybe this simple flash setup could help out:

http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/ind ... flash.html

BillT

User avatar
IanW
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Lancashire England

Re: Something a little different

#5 Post by IanW » Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:13 pm

Hello Bill and thanks. Yes I have tried something similar using a split prism instead of a mirror - it's rather hit and miss and of course not really providing for Koehler illumination. It also takes up a lot of space on the desk, and so I am thinking along the lines of channelling the flash through the light port - still not given it enough thought.
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4288
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: Something a little different

#6 Post by Hobbyst46 » Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:47 pm

Lovely pollen microphoto!

billbillt
Posts: 2895
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: Something a little different

#7 Post by billbillt » Mon Feb 18, 2019 9:29 pm

Hello Ian,

As you know, Kohler is not absolutely necessary for good microscopy.. A lot of lower cost stands, that still perform very well do not utilize it.. I personally like to try different appliances and configurations, regardless how unconventional they are, to find what suits me..

The Best,
BillT

User avatar
IanW
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Lancashire England

Re: Something a little different

#8 Post by IanW » Tue Feb 19, 2019 11:43 am

Thanks Bill - I will keep that in mind.
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL

User avatar
IanW
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Lancashire England

Re: Something a little different

#9 Post by IanW » Tue Feb 19, 2019 11:43 am

Hobbyst46 wrote:Lovely pollen microphoto!
Thank you:-)
Zeiss Jena NF, Zeiss Standard 18 and WL

apochronaut
Posts: 6327
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: Something a little different

#10 Post by apochronaut » Tue Feb 19, 2019 1:47 pm

An additional problem with living organisms is the sample thickness many of them provide. An individual organism or matrix of organisms, either way , ends up requiring an objective with an unusual depth of field in order to visualize it accurately. Deep samples allow an undesirable amount of travel in the Z axis. Adding a .17 cover slip to that just makes matters worse, sometimes to the point where image quality suffers too. It is always wise to include the cover slip thickness as part of the sample thickness and with high magnification, especially oil immersion, to keep the sample as shallow as possible and the cover slip likewise. I use .10-.12 as a rule.

Properly prepared slides take this into account and many of the good ones, if , mic'ed will come out around in the .17 to .20 range.

Post Reply