New Sub-forum

Post recommendations here. This is also the place where announcements will be made.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:22 am

New Sub-forum

#1 Post by admin » Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:50 pm

Hello!
I have added a new forum category called "Digital Processing". In this category you can talk about all issues relating to (computer-based) image processing, such as focus stacking and other image enhancing methods etc.
All the best, Oliver
Science may set limits to knowledge, but should not set limits to imagination.
(Bertrand Russell)

JimT
Posts: 3247
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 1:57 pm

Re: New Sub-forum

#2 Post by JimT » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:30 am

Good addition. Even us old guys can learn from others and offer others our techniques.

JimT

User avatar
gekko
Posts: 4701
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:38 am
Location: Durham, NC, USA.

Re: New Sub-forum

#3 Post by gekko » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:13 pm

Thank you, Oliver.

apochronaut
Posts: 2756
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: New Sub-forum

#4 Post by apochronaut » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:54 pm

I probably, at least partially stimulated this, by suggesting to Oliver that the section labelled pictures and videos be split in two. I am suspicious that some people( in fact I know of at least one) are inhibited from posting unpolished pictures, because some of the pictures are so polished that they are more computer generated , than microscope generated. I had suggested that pictures that have minimal post processing, within the bounds of what would would have taken place with emulsion film ; contrast,cropping, exposure and some sharpening be put into one section.
Those that have more sophisticated manipulation, such as stacking,chromatic aberration removal etc. be put into another section.

Since the beginning, being at the microscope has encouraged one to try to capture what the eye was seeing. The advent of sophisticated digital processing has made that so much more possible and that is great but it has also allowed the shift towards utilizing computer programs to synthesize what the mind wants to see. Stacking , in particular, can yield an otherworldly type of image , that is more in line with electron micrographs, than optical microgrographs. No body sees that way . I just think that they should be separated. One is based on the skill of the microscopist, the other on the skill of the computer programmer.

User avatar
Crater Eddie
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:39 pm
Location: Illinois USA

Re: New Sub-forum

#5 Post by Crater Eddie » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:11 pm

Thanks Oliver!
CE
Olympus BH-2 / BHTU with Olympus E-P1 MFT camera mounted
LOMO BIOLAM L-2-2
LOMO POLAM L-213 / BIOLAM L-211 hybrid
LOMO Multiscope (Biolam)

User avatar
KurtM
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2015 12:08 am
Location: League City, Texas
Contact:

Re: New Sub-forum

#6 Post by KurtM » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:43 am

Yes, many thanks to Oliver for all he does!

Phil, that's an interesting position you take, one that I will have to give some thought to. Heaven knows I feel similarly when it comes to astrophotography, where the fantastic images tend to bear little resemblance to what one observes at the eyepiece.
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas
email: ngc704(at)aol(dot)com
http://sawdustfactory.nfshost.com/microscopes/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/67904872@ ... 912223623/

Post Reply