Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

Here you can discuss everything related to taking light micrographs and videos.
Post Reply
Message
Author
geo_man
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:54 pm

Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

#1 Post by geo_man » Sun Apr 21, 2019 9:52 am

Hi all. I have a few questions regarding universal camera adapters labeled as ndpl-1 (2x) & ndpl-2 (2x):
1) is this a general product with same labeling used by various manufacturers? I've seen a wide range in price for these adapters.
2) what is the difference between these two adapters? Would one work better with my Canon M50 (APS-C)?

I have the ndpl-1 and it works pretty well, although the FOV is less than through the eyepiece. I was bothered by this until i started using PhotoStitcher. I'm wondering if the ndpl-2 would work even better.

Thanks!

MichaelG.
Posts: 4021
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

#2 Post by MichaelG. » Sun Apr 21, 2019 10:27 am

According to this seller, it appears that
-1 is Nikon fit
-2 is Canon fit
https://www.optics1.eu/search?controlle ... it_search=

Probably worth eMailing them to confirm.

MichaelG.
Too many 'projects'

geo_man
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

#3 Post by geo_man » Sun Apr 21, 2019 10:52 am

MichaelG. wrote:According to this seller, it appears that
-1 is Nikon fit
-2 is Canon fit
https://www.optics1.eu/search?controlle ... it_search=

Probably worth eMailing them to confirm.

MichaelG.
Thanks Michael.

That's confusing to me as the adapters come with T threads to allow camera specific adapters. Oh well...

MichaelG.
Posts: 4021
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

#4 Post by MichaelG. » Sun Apr 21, 2019 1:08 pm

geo_man wrote:That's confusing to me as the adapters come with T threads to allow camera specific adapters. Oh well...
It looks like they include the camera-specific T adapter
... which would explain the need for a suffix

MichaelG.
Too many 'projects'

geo_man
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

#5 Post by geo_man » Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:10 pm

MichaelG. wrote:
geo_man wrote:That's confusing to me as the adapters come with T threads to allow camera specific adapters. Oh well...
It looks like they include the camera-specific T adapter
... which would explain the need for a suffix

MichaelG.

Well that makes sense to me now. I've seen this part for sale from $59 to $450. Not sure if they are exact or different versions of same. Anyway, I'm pretty happy with the one I bought from a university surplus store for $25!!

Thanks again

Scarodactyl
Posts: 2787
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:09 pm

Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

#6 Post by Scarodactyl » Sun Apr 21, 2019 7:25 pm

That sounds like a very handy item, particularly for stereo scopes which don't need specific correction.

Sir
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 2:58 am

Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2

#7 Post by Sir » Sun May 03, 2020 1:05 pm

geo_man wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 9:52 am
Hi all. I have a few questions regarding universal camera adapters labeled as ndpl-1 (2x) & ndpl-2 (2x):
1) is this a general product with same labeling used by various manufacturers? I've seen a wide range in price for these adapters.
2) what is the difference between these two adapters? Would one work better with my Canon M50 (APS-C)?

I have the ndpl-1 and it works pretty well, although the FOV is less than through the eyepiece. I was bothered by this until i started using PhotoStitcher. I'm wondering if the ndpl-2 would work even better.

Thanks!
It just so happens that I have the same camera as you and was wondering the same thing. I bought both types and put up a comparison today, you can check it out here. Hope it helps!

Post Reply