Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
Hi all. I have a few questions regarding universal camera adapters labeled as ndpl-1 (2x) & ndpl-2 (2x):
1) is this a general product with same labeling used by various manufacturers? I've seen a wide range in price for these adapters.
2) what is the difference between these two adapters? Would one work better with my Canon M50 (APS-C)?
I have the ndpl-1 and it works pretty well, although the FOV is less than through the eyepiece. I was bothered by this until i started using PhotoStitcher. I'm wondering if the ndpl-2 would work even better.
Thanks!
1) is this a general product with same labeling used by various manufacturers? I've seen a wide range in price for these adapters.
2) what is the difference between these two adapters? Would one work better with my Canon M50 (APS-C)?
I have the ndpl-1 and it works pretty well, although the FOV is less than through the eyepiece. I was bothered by this until i started using PhotoStitcher. I'm wondering if the ndpl-2 would work even better.
Thanks!
Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
According to this seller, it appears that
-1 is Nikon fit
-2 is Canon fit
https://www.optics1.eu/search?controlle ... it_search=
Probably worth eMailing them to confirm.
MichaelG.
-1 is Nikon fit
-2 is Canon fit
https://www.optics1.eu/search?controlle ... it_search=
Probably worth eMailing them to confirm.
MichaelG.
Too many 'projects'
Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
Thanks Michael.MichaelG. wrote:According to this seller, it appears that
-1 is Nikon fit
-2 is Canon fit
https://www.optics1.eu/search?controlle ... it_search=
Probably worth eMailing them to confirm.
MichaelG.
That's confusing to me as the adapters come with T threads to allow camera specific adapters. Oh well...
Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
It looks like they include the camera-specific T adaptergeo_man wrote:That's confusing to me as the adapters come with T threads to allow camera specific adapters. Oh well...
... which would explain the need for a suffix
MichaelG.
Too many 'projects'
Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
MichaelG. wrote:It looks like they include the camera-specific T adaptergeo_man wrote:That's confusing to me as the adapters come with T threads to allow camera specific adapters. Oh well...
... which would explain the need for a suffix
MichaelG.
Well that makes sense to me now. I've seen this part for sale from $59 to $450. Not sure if they are exact or different versions of same. Anyway, I'm pretty happy with the one I bought from a university surplus store for $25!!
Thanks again
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:09 pm
Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
That sounds like a very handy item, particularly for stereo scopes which don't need specific correction.
Re: Universal microscope adapters, ndpl1 vs ndpl2
It just so happens that I have the same camera as you and was wondering the same thing. I bought both types and put up a comparison today, you can check it out here. Hope it helps!geo_man wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2019 9:52 amHi all. I have a few questions regarding universal camera adapters labeled as ndpl-1 (2x) & ndpl-2 (2x):
1) is this a general product with same labeling used by various manufacturers? I've seen a wide range in price for these adapters.
2) what is the difference between these two adapters? Would one work better with my Canon M50 (APS-C)?
I have the ndpl-1 and it works pretty well, although the FOV is less than through the eyepiece. I was bothered by this until i started using PhotoStitcher. I'm wondering if the ndpl-2 would work even better.
Thanks!