Homare UCE

This is the place where collectors can discuss their passion.
Post Reply
Message
Author
blankenship
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2019 10:08 pm

Homare UCE

#1 Post by blankenship » Thu Aug 29, 2019 11:53 pm

Hi all -

I've come across an Olympus UCE microscope, and am having a hard time finding info about it -
The Olympus museum site mentions a Harare UCE model, but specifies it as monocular.
https://www.olympus-global.com/technolo ... ogy_museum
Mine has a production date of 1955 but is binocular.

Anyone shed any light on this particular model?
Attachments
IMG_3775.JPG
IMG_3775.JPG (250.23 KiB) Viewed 10212 times
front.jpg
front.jpg (119.44 KiB) Viewed 10212 times
back.jpg
back.jpg (103.03 KiB) Viewed 10212 times
Lee Blankenship
Portland, Oregon

MichaelG.
Posts: 3976
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Homare UCE

#2 Post by MichaelG. » Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:02 am

That's a fine looking instrument, Lee

My guess is that, being from 1955 [i.e.just two years before the launch of the DF], it might be an 'Archaeopteryx' of microscope evolution.

MichaelG.

https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/ ... icro/1957/
Too many 'projects'

MicroBob
Posts: 3154
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 9:11 am
Location: Northern Germany

Re: Homare UCE

#3 Post by MicroBob » Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:06 am

Hi Lee,
the inspection certificate states that it is an UCEBi. Bi for Binocular.

Bob

MichaelG.
Posts: 3976
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Homare UCE

#4 Post by MichaelG. » Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:30 am

MicroBob wrote:the inspection certificate states that it is an UCEBi. Bi for Binocular.
... but the mystery is: What does the suffix IiI mean ?

MichaelG.
Too many 'projects'

MicroBob
Posts: 3154
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 9:11 am
Location: Northern Germany

Re: Homare UCE

#5 Post by MicroBob » Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:58 am

It might be "III" for 3.
From the design this microscope looks like as if it were inspired by pre WW 2 Zeiss microscopes.
It was for sure a model at the expensive end of the range.

Bob

MichaelG.
Posts: 3976
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Homare UCE

#6 Post by MichaelG. » Fri Aug 30, 2019 9:01 am

MicroBob wrote:It might be "III" for 3.
Yes it might, Bob
But [going by the photo] the middle character is different to the others.

MichaelG.
Last edited by MichaelG. on Fri Aug 30, 2019 9:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Too many 'projects'

MichaelG.
Posts: 3976
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:24 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Homare UCE

#7 Post by MichaelG. » Fri Aug 30, 2019 9:04 am

IMG_3284.JPG
IMG_3284.JPG (18.45 KiB) Viewed 10170 times
Too many 'projects'

User avatar
zzffnn
Posts: 3200
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 3:57 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Homare UCE

#8 Post by zzffnn » Fri Aug 30, 2019 1:58 pm

MicroBob wrote:It might be "III" for 3.
From the design this microscope looks like as if it were inspired by pre WW 2 Zeiss microscopes.
It was for sure a model at the expensive end of the range.

Bob
Yes, it looks that way to me as well. Higher end Zeiss copy/clone.

Maybe the condenser and head dovetail mounts would have the same diameters as those of early Zeiss and LOMO (and therefore can use those parts) too.

apochronaut
Posts: 6271
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: Homare UCE

#9 Post by apochronaut » Fri Aug 30, 2019 3:28 pm

The post W.W.II Japanese companies, and not just those related to optics were quite schizophrenic when it came to their designs. While they freely swiped whatever designs they could from the Germans during that period when patent restrictions applied to them, they were also flooded with American goods during the Showa period of occupation. Design influences were many.

The early designs of Shintaro Terada, for M & Katera, used either total knockoffs of Leitz objectives, or they were made outright by Leitz; such is their similarity, right down to the upside down logo and stamped specs., a unique feature of Leitz at the time. When he started designing for Olympus around 1919, the objectives on their early microscopes appear to be identical. M & Katera, eventually became Tiyoda but Shintaro Terada was the chief engineer for both of those startups.

One odd feature of post W.W. II Olympus , is the weird 36.5+ mm parfocal distance, which that UCE probably has. There is no doubt that Bausch & Lomb microscopes were pretty common in Occupied Japan and they curiously had a parfocal distance of 1-7/16" until the flat field era came out of Rochester. 1-7/16" is just over 36.5mm.
I am guessing that a close examination of the early post W.W. II microscopes from many companies would show a little bit of this and a little bit of that.

blankenship
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2019 10:08 pm

Re: Homare UCE

#10 Post by blankenship » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:13 pm

Thanks for the info, everyone!
I've decided not to keep this one. Any ideas as to value or relative desirability?
Lee Blankenship
Portland, Oregon

Post Reply