Microbehunter Microscopy Magazine Logo Banner Micrographs

Popular Posts

Some Thoughts on Recreational / Amateur Microscopy

Amatuer Microscopy and Amateur Astronomy

I don’t know how many of you still remember comet Hale-Bopp, which became visible back in 1996-97. The comet was the incentive for me to become involved in amateur astronomy. The Internet, at that time, was still young and for this reason I obtained most of the info about the comet from astronomy magazines that I bought at the magazine store located in the local train station. I remember, that there were about 5-7 different astronomy magazines (in several languages) in the shop. The range was quite impressive: Some magazines were quite advanced and scientific. Others were much more down-to-earth, targeting readers interested in a more casual and popular approach. I scrutinized them in detail, and found one which had the right mix between science and hands-on advice and one which was just right for beginners. I subscribed to the magazine, looked at the ads, and mail-ordered a small telescope. I became a star-gazer. Together with two other friends, I spent many hours in the cold night looking at the stars and trying to identify them with the help of a star chart. We had a great time. And I remember that I was even crazy enough to keep a diary of my observations.

Just one year later, in 1998, I also got involved with amateur microscopy and spent a little fortune on a compound microscope. This was not the first time for me to use microscopes, I did quite a bit of bright-field and phase-contrast work during my university studies, mostly in the field of bacteriology. At that time I used different staining techniques to characterize the bacteria that we isolated, to help us in the identification process. At the end of my studies, I decided to continue microscopy as a hobby and to broaden my microscopic endeavors into exploring my surroundings. I obtained water samples, looked at the algae, purified diatoms, photographed the crystallization of Vitamin C and citric acid. I also made video recordings of these events and had some nice educational material. But this is a different story.

I quickly realized that the life of a recreational microscopist resembles the life of a “lone wolf”. Microscopy magazines with a recreational approach are scarce, at least I could find none of them in the magazine shop. Many science journals from the university library did address a range of microscopy-related issues, but the topics were far too specific and not understandable to someone without a scientific background in the particular research area. In many cases the topics revolved around more advanced electron microscopic techniques – interesting, for certain, provided that you understood the science behind it. Very few magazines had the “amateur-approach” of astronomy magazines. In particular, nice colorful pictures were missing.

Naturally I do understand that there is a fundamental difference between true science journals and “recreational” magazines, which can be bought in a magazine shop. A notable exception is the German microscopy magazine Mikrokosmos, which tries to place a stronger focus on the “observation” aspect. The online magazine Micscape also goes into this direction. Just a pity that they don’t also offer a nicely formatted PDF version (I’d even be willing to pay for one, if it’s not too expensive).

Now why is this? Why is there such an imbalance between amateur microscopy and astronomy? Does it have historic reasons? Maybe the entry barrier into amateur astronomy is higher (equipment costs, knowledge required etc.) and therefore the support by astronomy clubs and organizations may be more important than for microscopy. Maybe these organizations helped to promote and support amateur astronomy over many years and there is a stronger tradition and community. Or could it be, that there are indeed many amateur microscopists around, but that they are simply not organized into clubs and therefore not visible to the public? But even if this were the case, there should be many amatuer microscopy magazines around, which is not the case.

Maybe microscopes simply do not offer as many possibilities for the technical tinkerer as telescopes. Amateur telescope making seems to be so popular that this activity even has its own acronym: “ATM”. Try to Google “amateur microscope making”, and you will be awarded with an astonishing 2 hits (yes this is two). The search string “amateur telescope making” gives you 30900 hits (August 2010). OK, maybe this comparison is a bit unfair, considering the fact that quite usable microscopes can already be obtained for a comparatively low price, but the discrepancy is startling nevertheless. Still, I recommend this link here, it’s pretty good http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/ucomp1/ucomp1.htm

In any case, I’ll continue to publish my thoughts on this issue and encourage you to write a comment.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


  • […] You may also be Interested in the following Related Posts: Some Thoughts on Recreational / Amateur Microscopy […]

  • Greg Bartgis says:

    So,so true!My hobbies are a bit more encompassing than the average.In general,I refer to my own as “Industrial”hobbies which run a gamut to include woodworking,metalworking,photography,and microscopy.I’ve also gone through an astronomy phase,as you have.Some of these bring me income,but the common thread is that I do them for enjoyment and enlightenment.The problem you mention of not being able to find much literary,technical and moral support has been the bane of my own persuits,and this is not exclusively a microscopy problem,either.While woodworking is well supported in the press,metalworking (machining)is difficult,dangerous,and treated more as a trade without hobby value.Like microscopy,metalworking can be an extremely EXPENSIVE hobby-so is considered too exclusive to be of interest to most people.The same applies to microscopy.The levels of arcane and esoteric knowledge required in order to effectively perform in either persuit are more than most would care to master.I’ve considered this long and long.I personally find much which is common to all of these,and any microscopist could do with a little basic machining knowledge,because,as you stated,there is much to be said for making your own.Check the excellent articles by Ted Clarke in Modern Microscopy Journal-he writes for the”Microscopy In The Home Shop”section.I’m a huge fan of his work,and he’s a great correspondent!I do strongly believe that a publication with a general focus on these combined industrial and scientific topics could prove to have real value to the industrial/science/trades hobbyist.Yours-G.Bartgis

  • Yamir says:

    Yes. I too was feeling like a ‘lone wolf’ in this, often thinking that this was a dead hobby, even on the Internet. I’m glad that I finally found your site.

  • John Robinson says:

    I have been following your magazine for a couple of years now, with great enjoyment. It has inspired me to take this hobby a little more seriously, acquire better equipment, and familiarize myself with microscopy generally, often through your pages. Thank you for the magazine…and the inspiration!

  • Wilhelm Resch says:

    A cheap telescope will show you Jupiter with its moons, the moon looks awesome and even the rings of Saturn can be seen, but cheap microscopes are so lousy that the enthusiasm disappears after the first attempt.

    • Oliver says:

      This is because of the low resolution of cheap microscopes. Cheap telescopes can still operate over the resolution limit, but with microscopes one is quickly at the physical limit.

Anything to say? Leave a comment!