<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MicrobeHunter.com &#187; electron microscope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microbehunter.com/tag/electron-microscope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microbehunter.com</link>
	<description>of Microscopy, Microbes and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Q &amp; A: What people searched for</title>
		<link>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/05/09/q-a-what-people-searched-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/05/09/q-a-what-people-searched-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microscopy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microscopy FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beginner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compound microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbehunter.com/?p=2429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post I&#8217;d like to address some of the search queries that people typed to find this web site. Naturally people typed many, many more search queries, most of the queries are made of 1 or 2 words. I selected the longer ones for this post. Q: What is the principal advantage of an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this post I&#8217;d like to address some of the search queries that people typed to find this web site. Naturally people typed many, many more search queries, most of the queries are made of 1 or 2 words. I selected the longer ones for this post.</p>
<p><strong>Q: What is the principal advantage of an electron microscope over an optical microscope?</strong><br />
A: Electron microscopes have a far greater resolution compared to optical microscopes. Consequently, a much higher magnification is possible. Optical microscopes can magnify up to about 1000x, electron microscopes up to about 1 000 000x.</p>
<p><strong>Q: How to increase resolution of image?</strong><br />
A: The resolution of am image can not simply be increased, once a picture has been taken through the microscope. Information which is not present in the first place can not simply be created. When taking pictures with the microscope, one should make sure that all the parameters are optimized to reach the maximum theoretical resolution. This includes a steady camera-microscope connection, the correct condenser diaphragm setting, the optimum mounting medium, etc.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Parts of the microscope and their functions?</strong><br />
A: This question can not simply be answered in a line or two. I would recommend to watch the <a href="http://www.microbehunter.com/2009/02/14/introducing-the-microscope/">video</a>, or read the post: <a href='http://www.microbehunter.com/2008/12/31/parts-of-a-compound-microscope/'>Parts of a Compound Microscope</a></p>
<p><strong>Q: What are some microbes that you can see under a microscope?</strong><br />
A: Ultimately you can see all types of microbes, provided you have the right type of microscope and use the appropriate technique. Viruses can be seen with electron microscopes, but not with light microscopes. Bacteria can best be seen with light microscopes that use phase contrast optics. Single celled eukaryotes (ciliates, algae etc.) as well as multicellular microorganisms can be seen with bight-field compound microscopes and also with stereo microscopes.</p>
<p><strong>Q: How many different types of microscopes are there?</strong><br />
A: It depends on what system of classification you use and how many subdivisions you include. One common way to classify microscopes is into optical and non-optical microscopes. I already wrote a post on different types of microscopes: <a href=''></a></p>
<p><strong>Q: Which type of microscope would be best to use if you wanted a 3-dimensional view of a bacteria cell?</strong><br />
A: Here you have to be careful, the question can be misinterpreted. For true 3D, stereoscopic views two different images are needed. </p>
<p>There are two types of microscopes that provide 3-D (stereoscopic) views:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Scanning electron microscopes:</strong> These devices scan the surface of the object. One single image is produced, which appears 3D (including &#8220;shadows&#8221; and surface texture). An example image can be found in this article: </li>
<li><strong>Confocal laser microscopes:</strong> These are highly specialized optical microscopes, in which a computer computes a final. In this case it is possible to compute two different pictures, one for the left and one for the right eye. The image is then truly stereoscopic</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Q: Compare the kind of image obtained with scanning electron microscope with that obtained using transmission electron microscopy.</strong><br />
A: In short, scanning electron microscope (SEMs) produce images that have a 3D appearance, Transmission electron microscopes (TEMs) produce 2D images.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Why is it desirable that microscope objectives be parfocal?</strong><br />
A: Parfocal objectives are not only desirable, but (in my humble view) a necessity for efficient microscopic work. Parfocal objectives manufactured in such a way that a change in objective will not result in a significant loss of focus. If the image is in focus using a 4x objective, then the image is also in focus when a 10x objective is used. Significant refocussing is not necessary with parfocal objectives. </p>
<p><strong>Q: Part of the microscope that contains the ocular lens</strong><br />
A: One word answer: the eyepiece. Sometimes the terms &#8220;eyepiece&#8221; and &#8220;ocular lens&#8221; are used interchangeably, but the eye piece contains more than one lens element.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Different types of microbes</strong><br />
A: The term &#8220;microbe&#8221; is a colloquial term which refers to organisms (living things) that are too small to be seen with the unaided eye. The term is somewhat unclear, because microscopic insects (and other multicellular organisms) generally are not included. Viruses are not alive and therefore do not quality as microorganisms. Without going into too much detail, microorganisms include prokaryotes (<em>Bacteria</em>, <em>Archaea</em>), microscopic fungi, single-celled algae and protozoa (ciliates and amoeba belong to this category, among others). </p>
<p><strong>Q: Who invented the microscope?</strong><br />
A: Which microscope? There are many kinds. In 1931, Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll constructed the first prototype of an electron microscope. Optical microscopes as we know them today evolved over a longer time period. Many people contributed to the developments. Two notable figures are Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632 &#8211; 1723) and Robert Hook (1635 &#8211; 1703).  Leeuwenhoek made single-lens microscopes with which he discovered bacteria. Hook constructed compound microscopes (composed of objective and ocular lenses) and coined the term &#8220;cell&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/05/09/q-a-what-people-searched-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different types of microscopes</title>
		<link>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/19/different-types-of-microscopes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/19/different-types-of-microscopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning proble microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-ray microscope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbehunter.com/?p=1468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many different types of microscopes are there? More than you probably thought. I tried to research a list of different types, based on the physical principle used to make an image. Of course, one could also classify the microscopes based on their area of application, their cost, their versatility or any other aspect. These [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many different types of microscopes are there? More than you probably thought. I tried to research a list of different types, based on the physical principle used to make an image. Of course, one could also classify the microscopes based on their area of application, their cost, their versatility or any other aspect. These classification systems do have a problem: In this case one one type of microscope can be allocated to several groups, and the system becomes &#8220;messy&#8221;. </p>
<p><strong>Optical Microscopes:</strong> These microscopes use visible light (or UV light in the case of fluorescence microscopy) to make an image. The light is refracted with optical lenses. The first microscopes that were invented belong to this category. The price of optical microscopes varies from very cheap to nearly unfordable (for the private person, at least). Optical microscopes can be further subdivided into several categories:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Compound Microscope:</strong> These microscopes are composed of two lens systems, an objective and an ocular (eye piece). The maximum useful magnification of a compound microscope is about 1000x.</li>
<li><strong>Stereo Microscope </strong>(dissecting microscope): These microscopes magnify up to about maximum 100x and supply a 3-dimensional view of the specimen. They are useful for observing opaque objects.</li>
<li><strong>Confocal Laser scanning microscope:</strong> Unlike compound and stereo microscopes, these devices are reserved for research organizations. They are able to scan a sample also in depth. A computer is then able to assemble the data to make a 3D image.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>X-ray Microscope:</strong> As the name suggests, these microscopes use a beam of x-rays to create an image. Due to the small wavelength, the image resolution is higher than in optical microscopes. The maximum useful magnification is therefore also higher and is between the optical microscopes and electron microscopes. One advantage of x-ray microscopes over electron microscopes is, that it is possible to observe living cells.</p>
<p><strong>Scanning acoustic microscope (SAM):</strong> These devices use focused sound waves to generate an image. They are used in materials science to detect small cracks or tensions in materials. SAMs can also be used in biology where they help to uncover tensions, stress and elasticity inside biological structure.  </p>
<p><strong>Scanning Helium Ion Microscope (SHIM or HeIM):</strong> As the name suggests, these devices use a beam of Helium ions to generate an image. There are several advantages to electron microscopes, one being that the sample is left mostly intact (due to the low energy requirements) and that it provides a high resolution. It is a relatively new technology and the first commercial systems were released in 2007.</p>
<p><strong>Neutron Microscope:</strong> These microscopes are still in an experimental stage. They have a high resolution and may offer better contrast than other forms of microscopy.</p>
<p><strong>Electron Microscopes: </strong>Modern electron microscopes can magnify up to 2 million times. This is possible, because the wavelength of high energy electrons is very small. At the same time, the high energy electrons are pretty tough on the sample being observed. It may take a long time to completely dehydrate and prepare the specimen. Some biological specimens also need to be coated with a very thin layer of a metal before they can be observed.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): </strong>In this case, the electron beam is passed through the sample. The result is a two dimensional image.</li>
<li><strong>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): </strong>Here the electron beam is projected on the sample. The electrons do not go through the sample but bounce off. This way it is possible to visualize the surface structure of the specimen. The image appears 3 dimensional.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Scanning Probe Microscopes:</strong> It is possible to visualize individual atoms with these microscopes. The image of the atom is computer-generated, however. A small tip measures the surface structure of the sample by rastering over the surface. If an atom projects out of the surface, then a higher electrical current will flow through the tip. The amount of current is proportional to the height of the structure. A computer will then assemble the position data of the tip and the current to generate an image. </p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Microscopes can be classified based on the physical principle that is used to generate an image. Different microscopes visualize different physical characteristics of the sample (eg. elasticity can be visualized with acoustic microscopes). Image contrast, resolution (which determines magnification) and destructiveness of the sample are other relevant parameters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/19/different-types-of-microscopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electron Microscopes vs. Optical (Light) microscopes</title>
		<link>http://www.microbehunter.com/2009/01/22/electron-microscopes-vs-optical-light-microscopes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbehunter.com/2009/01/22/electron-microscopes-vs-optical-light-microscopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microscopy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beginner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compound microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron microscope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microscopy.okim.info/?p=1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post outlines the advantages and disadvantages of electron microscopes in contrast to optical (light) microscopes. Each type of microscope is designed for different areas of applications.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div style='float:right; width:200px; margin-left:10px; margin-bottom:20px; margin-right:5px; clear:both;'>

<a href='http://www.microbehunter.com/wp/view-image?filename=http://www.microbehunter.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sem_pollen.jpg&alt=Scanning electron micrograph of various Pollen - (C) Oliver Kim&caption=Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of various Pollen. Public domain image reference: Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility, Dartmouth College</a>'>
<img src='http://www.microbehunter.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sem_pollen.jpg' alt='Scanning electron micrograph of various Pollen - (C) Oliver Kim' style='width:200px;'>
</a>
<div style='font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic; padding-left:5px; padding-top:5px; margin:0px; line-height:12px;'>Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of various Pollen. Public domain image reference: Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility, Dartmouth College</a><br></div>
</div>
 <br /> Check this link for even more different types of microscopes: <a href='http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/19/different-types-of-microscopes/'>Different types of microscopes</a> <div class='summary'>This post outlines the advantages and disadvantages of electron microscopes in contrast to optical (light) microscopes. Each type of microscope is designed for different areas of applications.</div>
<h2>Electron vs. Light Microscopes: Basic Differences</h2>
<p>There are not many things that these two microscope types have in common. Both electron and light microscopes are technical devices which are used for visualizing structures that are too small to see with the unaided eye, and both types have relevant areas of applications in biology and the materials sciences. And this is pretty much it. The method of visualizing the structures is very different. Electron Microscopes use electrons and not photons (light rays) for visualization. The first electron microscope was constructed in 1931, compared to optical microscopes they are a very recent invention. </p>
<h2>Electron microscopes have certain advantages over optical microscopes:</h2>
<ul>
<li>The biggest advantage is that they have a higher resolution and are therefore also able of a higher magnification (up to 2 million times). Light microscopes can show a useful magnification only up to 1000-2000 times. This is a physical limit imposed by the wavelength of the light. Electron microscopes therefore allow for the visualization of structures that would normally be not visible by optical microscopy.</li>
<li>Depending on the type of electron microscope, it is possible to view the three dimensional external shape of an object (Scanning Electron Microscope)</li>
<li>In scanning electron microscopy (SEM), due to the nature of electrons, electron microscopes have a greater depth of field compared to light microscopes. The higher resolution may also give the human eye the subjective impression of a higher depth of field.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Electron microscopes have a range of disadvantages as well:</h2>
<ul>
<li>They are extremely expensive.</li>
<li>Sample preparation is often much more elaborate. It is often necessary to coat the specimen with a very thin layer of metal (such as gold). The metal is able to reflect the electrons.</li>
<li>The sample must be completely dry. This makes it impossible to observe living specimens.</li>
<li>It is not possible to observe moving specimens (they are dead).</li>
<li>It is not possible to observe color. Electrons do not possess a color. The image is only black/white. Sometimes the image is colored artificially to give a better visual impression.</li>
<li>They require more training and experience in identifying artifacts that may have been introduced during the sample preparation process.</li>
<li>The energy of the electron beam is very high. The sample is therefore exposed to high radiation, and therefore not able to live.</li>
</ul>
<h2>When should one use optical (light) microscopes?</h2>
<p>One big advantage of light microscopes is the ability to observe living cells. It is possible to observe a wide range of biological activity, such as the uptake of food, cell division and movement. Additionally, it is possible to use in-vivo staining techniques to observe the uptake of colored pigments by the cells. These processes can not be observed in real time using electron microscopes, as the specimen has to be fixed, and completely dehydrated (and is therefore dead). The low cost of optical microscopes makes them useful in a wide range of different areas, such as education, the medical sector or for hobbyists. Generally, optical and electron microscopes have different areas of application and they complement each other.</p>
<h2>Different types of electron microscopes</h2>
<p>There are two different types of electron microscopes, scanning electron microscopes (SEM) and transmission electron microscopes (TEM). In the TEM method, an electron beam is passed through an extremely thin section of the specimen. You will get a two-dimensional cross-section of the specimen. SEMs, in contrast, visualize the surface structure of the specimen, providing a 3-D impression. The image above was produced by a SEM.</p>
<h2>Different types of light microscopes</h2>
<p>The two most common types of microscopes are compound microscopes and stereo microscopes (dissecting microscopes). Stereo microscopes are frequently used to observe larger, opaque specimens. They generally do not magnify as much as compound microscopes (around 40x-70x maximum) but give a truly stereoscopic view. This is because the image delivered to each eye is slightly different. Stereo microscopes do not necessarily require elaborate sample preparation.</p>
<p>Compound microscopes magnify up to about 1000x. The specimen has to be sufficiently thin and bright for the microscope light to pass through. The specimen is mounted on a glass slide. Compound microscopes are not capable of producing a 3D (stereoscopic) view, even if they possess two eye pieces. This is because each one of the eyes receives the same image from the objective. The light beam is simply split in two. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbehunter.com/2009/01/22/electron-microscopes-vs-optical-light-microscopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>