<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MicrobeHunter.com &#187; tem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microbehunter.com/tag/tem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microbehunter.com</link>
	<description>of Microscopy, Microbes and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:31:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Q &amp; A: What people searched for</title>
		<link>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/05/09/q-a-what-people-searched-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/05/09/q-a-what-people-searched-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microscopy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microscopy FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beginner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compound microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbehunter.com/?p=2429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post I&#8217;d like to address some of the search queries that people typed to find this web site. Naturally people typed many, many more search queries, most of the queries are made of 1 or 2 words. I selected the longer ones for this post. Q: What is the principal advantage of an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this post I&#8217;d like to address some of the search queries that people typed to find this web site. Naturally people typed many, many more search queries, most of the queries are made of 1 or 2 words. I selected the longer ones for this post.</p>
<p><strong>Q: What is the principal advantage of an electron microscope over an optical microscope?</strong><br />
A: Electron microscopes have a far greater resolution compared to optical microscopes. Consequently, a much higher magnification is possible. Optical microscopes can magnify up to about 1000x, electron microscopes up to about 1 000 000x.</p>
<p><strong>Q: How to increase resolution of image?</strong><br />
A: The resolution of am image can not simply be increased, once a picture has been taken through the microscope. Information which is not present in the first place can not simply be created. When taking pictures with the microscope, one should make sure that all the parameters are optimized to reach the maximum theoretical resolution. This includes a steady camera-microscope connection, the correct condenser diaphragm setting, the optimum mounting medium, etc.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Parts of the microscope and their functions?</strong><br />
A: This question can not simply be answered in a line or two. I would recommend to watch the <a href="http://www.microbehunter.com/2009/02/14/introducing-the-microscope/">video</a>, or read the post: <a href='http://www.microbehunter.com/2008/12/31/parts-of-a-compound-microscope/'>Parts of a Compound Microscope</a></p>
<p><strong>Q: What are some microbes that you can see under a microscope?</strong><br />
A: Ultimately you can see all types of microbes, provided you have the right type of microscope and use the appropriate technique. Viruses can be seen with electron microscopes, but not with light microscopes. Bacteria can best be seen with light microscopes that use phase contrast optics. Single celled eukaryotes (ciliates, algae etc.) as well as multicellular microorganisms can be seen with bight-field compound microscopes and also with stereo microscopes.</p>
<p><strong>Q: How many different types of microscopes are there?</strong><br />
A: It depends on what system of classification you use and how many subdivisions you include. One common way to classify microscopes is into optical and non-optical microscopes. I already wrote a post on different types of microscopes: <a href=''></a></p>
<p><strong>Q: Which type of microscope would be best to use if you wanted a 3-dimensional view of a bacteria cell?</strong><br />
A: Here you have to be careful, the question can be misinterpreted. For true 3D, stereoscopic views two different images are needed. </p>
<p>There are two types of microscopes that provide 3-D (stereoscopic) views:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Scanning electron microscopes:</strong> These devices scan the surface of the object. One single image is produced, which appears 3D (including &#8220;shadows&#8221; and surface texture). An example image can be found in this article: </li>
<li><strong>Confocal laser microscopes:</strong> These are highly specialized optical microscopes, in which a computer computes a final. In this case it is possible to compute two different pictures, one for the left and one for the right eye. The image is then truly stereoscopic</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Q: Compare the kind of image obtained with scanning electron microscope with that obtained using transmission electron microscopy.</strong><br />
A: In short, scanning electron microscope (SEMs) produce images that have a 3D appearance, Transmission electron microscopes (TEMs) produce 2D images.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Why is it desirable that microscope objectives be parfocal?</strong><br />
A: Parfocal objectives are not only desirable, but (in my humble view) a necessity for efficient microscopic work. Parfocal objectives manufactured in such a way that a change in objective will not result in a significant loss of focus. If the image is in focus using a 4x objective, then the image is also in focus when a 10x objective is used. Significant refocussing is not necessary with parfocal objectives. </p>
<p><strong>Q: Part of the microscope that contains the ocular lens</strong><br />
A: One word answer: the eyepiece. Sometimes the terms &#8220;eyepiece&#8221; and &#8220;ocular lens&#8221; are used interchangeably, but the eye piece contains more than one lens element.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Different types of microbes</strong><br />
A: The term &#8220;microbe&#8221; is a colloquial term which refers to organisms (living things) that are too small to be seen with the unaided eye. The term is somewhat unclear, because microscopic insects (and other multicellular organisms) generally are not included. Viruses are not alive and therefore do not quality as microorganisms. Without going into too much detail, microorganisms include prokaryotes (<em>Bacteria</em>, <em>Archaea</em>), microscopic fungi, single-celled algae and protozoa (ciliates and amoeba belong to this category, among others). </p>
<p><strong>Q: Who invented the microscope?</strong><br />
A: Which microscope? There are many kinds. In 1931, Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll constructed the first prototype of an electron microscope. Optical microscopes as we know them today evolved over a longer time period. Many people contributed to the developments. Two notable figures are Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632 &#8211; 1723) and Robert Hook (1635 &#8211; 1703).  Leeuwenhoek made single-lens microscopes with which he discovered bacteria. Hook constructed compound microscopes (composed of objective and ocular lenses) and coined the term &#8220;cell&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/05/09/q-a-what-people-searched-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different types of microscopes</title>
		<link>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/19/different-types-of-microscopes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/19/different-types-of-microscopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning proble microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-ray microscope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbehunter.com/?p=1468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many different types of microscopes are there? More than you probably thought. I tried to research a list of different types, based on the physical principle used to make an image. Of course, one could also classify the microscopes based on their area of application, their cost, their versatility or any other aspect. These [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many different types of microscopes are there? More than you probably thought. I tried to research a list of different types, based on the physical principle used to make an image. Of course, one could also classify the microscopes based on their area of application, their cost, their versatility or any other aspect. These classification systems do have a problem: In this case one one type of microscope can be allocated to several groups, and the system becomes &#8220;messy&#8221;. </p>
<p><strong>Optical Microscopes:</strong> These microscopes use visible light (or UV light in the case of fluorescence microscopy) to make an image. The light is refracted with optical lenses. The first microscopes that were invented belong to this category. The price of optical microscopes varies from very cheap to nearly unfordable (for the private person, at least). Optical microscopes can be further subdivided into several categories:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Compound Microscope:</strong> These microscopes are composed of two lens systems, an objective and an ocular (eye piece). The maximum useful magnification of a compound microscope is about 1000x.</li>
<li><strong>Stereo Microscope </strong>(dissecting microscope): These microscopes magnify up to about maximum 100x and supply a 3-dimensional view of the specimen. They are useful for observing opaque objects.</li>
<li><strong>Confocal Laser scanning microscope:</strong> Unlike compound and stereo microscopes, these devices are reserved for research organizations. They are able to scan a sample also in depth. A computer is then able to assemble the data to make a 3D image.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>X-ray Microscope:</strong> As the name suggests, these microscopes use a beam of x-rays to create an image. Due to the small wavelength, the image resolution is higher than in optical microscopes. The maximum useful magnification is therefore also higher and is between the optical microscopes and electron microscopes. One advantage of x-ray microscopes over electron microscopes is, that it is possible to observe living cells.</p>
<p><strong>Scanning acoustic microscope (SAM):</strong> These devices use focused sound waves to generate an image. They are used in materials science to detect small cracks or tensions in materials. SAMs can also be used in biology where they help to uncover tensions, stress and elasticity inside biological structure.  </p>
<p><strong>Scanning Helium Ion Microscope (SHIM or HeIM):</strong> As the name suggests, these devices use a beam of Helium ions to generate an image. There are several advantages to electron microscopes, one being that the sample is left mostly intact (due to the low energy requirements) and that it provides a high resolution. It is a relatively new technology and the first commercial systems were released in 2007.</p>
<p><strong>Neutron Microscope:</strong> These microscopes are still in an experimental stage. They have a high resolution and may offer better contrast than other forms of microscopy.</p>
<p><strong>Electron Microscopes: </strong>Modern electron microscopes can magnify up to 2 million times. This is possible, because the wavelength of high energy electrons is very small. At the same time, the high energy electrons are pretty tough on the sample being observed. It may take a long time to completely dehydrate and prepare the specimen. Some biological specimens also need to be coated with a very thin layer of a metal before they can be observed.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): </strong>In this case, the electron beam is passed through the sample. The result is a two dimensional image.</li>
<li><strong>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): </strong>Here the electron beam is projected on the sample. The electrons do not go through the sample but bounce off. This way it is possible to visualize the surface structure of the specimen. The image appears 3 dimensional.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Scanning Probe Microscopes:</strong> It is possible to visualize individual atoms with these microscopes. The image of the atom is computer-generated, however. A small tip measures the surface structure of the sample by rastering over the surface. If an atom projects out of the surface, then a higher electrical current will flow through the tip. The amount of current is proportional to the height of the structure. A computer will then assemble the position data of the tip and the current to generate an image. </p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Microscopes can be classified based on the physical principle that is used to generate an image. Different microscopes visualize different physical characteristics of the sample (eg. elasticity can be visualized with acoustic microscopes). Image contrast, resolution (which determines magnification) and destructiveness of the sample are other relevant parameters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbehunter.com/2010/01/19/different-types-of-microscopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

