It's no problem at all, CECrater Eddie wrote:... I did, sorry. ...
All's well that ends well
MichaelG.
It's no problem at all, CECrater Eddie wrote:... I did, sorry. ...
Thanks for the reassurance ... I had obviously misinterpreted your earlier postHobbyst46 wrote:MichaelG , it is the same as in the photo. A standard proper upgrade , not DIY.
and, for those of an inquisitive nature, here is the DataSheet:75RR wrote:... Much better to use a Direct Current Driver instead.
Scarodactyl wrote:That's a pretty key detail, isn't it?
It's located in North Carolina in the US, so UK shipping could be inconvenient.
My thoughts exactlyHobbyst46 wrote:Insect wings are IMHO better examples of the performance of the microscope than the images posted on the Amazon site. The wing is flat, uniform and usually not too rich in colors. So FOV flatness and uniformity of brightness and any aberrations should be detectable.