No tool required?

Do you have any microscopy questions, which you are afraid to ask? This is your place.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Plasmid
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:34 am
Location: North GA
Contact:

No tool required?

#1 Post by Plasmid » Fri Feb 12, 2021 4:36 am

Question

What effect is there if one were to remove the diffuser filter on a microscope below the field diaphragm..... Said filter is held in place by a large ring with two small indentions/slot on opposite sites of the diameter , what tool is used to remove this ring?

dtsh
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:06 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: No tool required?

#2 Post by dtsh » Fri Feb 12, 2021 5:02 am

Perhaps a snap ring? If so there are special plier sets for them, frequently encountered in automotive and other mechanicals.

hans
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 11:10 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: No tool required?

#3 Post by hans » Fri Feb 12, 2021 6:18 am

Sounds like a threaded retaining ring. Search "spanner wrench optics" for example shows some of the types of tools available. I have not tried the inexpensive ones sold for camera lens repair but they look kind of flimsy for use on older stuff where the retaining rings are often seized up. So far all the retaining rings I have needed to get out were reachable using two slotted screwdriver bits held in a pair of locking needle-nose pliers. Awkward to get the bits clamped in the right position but very rigid once locked.

MicroBob
Posts: 3154
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 9:11 am
Location: Northern Germany

Re: No tool required?

#4 Post by MicroBob » Fri Feb 12, 2021 6:53 am

Does it look similar to the rings that hold the glass in camera filters? These are usually screwed in as Hans has described. I somtimes clamp slot screw bits in a machinist vise in the right distance and set the part onto them from above. Before you start working you might put a disc of cardboad or plastic on to of the cleaned glass filter so you don't scratch it as easily.

dtsh
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:06 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: No tool required?

#5 Post by dtsh » Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:32 pm

I wasn't visualizing what you were describing!

Thats a type of spanner like this:
23cb90f1b57f4e95a7c93f829f017354.jpg
23cb90f1b57f4e95a7c93f829f017354.jpg (32.19 KiB) Viewed 2919 times
I have sometimes been able to spin them loose with a pin or screwdriver in one slot and gently pushing to make it rotate, but it's easy to slip and scratch things that way.

apochronaut
Posts: 6327
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: No tool required?

#6 Post by apochronaut » Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:39 pm

If the slots are on opposite sides , it is likely a threaded retaining ring. I have a epecialized set of needle nose pliers that have the jaws bent at a right angle and ground to a finer point for many of those. I also bought a lens ring spanner on ebay for 12.00. It has two reversible bits in it. s!ot on one end and point on the other. It gets down to about 1/2cm.
Hans' system is also a good one, if you have the bits and needle nose vicegrips.

If the ring has holes close together it is a kind of circlip. Dedicated spring loaded circlip pliers with expandable or contractable jaws bent at various angles are available. I bought a cheap set of 4 years ago and they are very good about what I would call mid-grade. Nice drop forged jaws. A lot for 6.00. I haven't come across a circlip that I can't get out since. I had to emery the points down a little.


I just saw dtsh's post. That is a similar spanner to mine.

Plasmid
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:34 am
Location: North GA
Contact:

Re: No tool required?

#7 Post by Plasmid » Fri Feb 12, 2021 4:47 pm

Awesome, thank you all, the rink seems to be pretty stuck, I've considered the flat head tap tap tap approach but don't want to damage it I got a pair of spare compression ring pliers that I'll probably modify the tips like mentioned above.
Attachments
IMG_20210212_114321721.jpg
IMG_20210212_114321721.jpg (73.76 KiB) Viewed 2890 times

Plasmid
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:34 am
Location: North GA
Contact:

Re: No tool required?

#8 Post by Plasmid » Fri Feb 12, 2021 4:57 pm

I remember reading that ND filters need to be changed from time to time, how does one know when the filter is shot? And is there any other alternatives out there as in different opaque levels and or other filters lile lambda or retarder plates that can be used?

After removing the ND filter the images under polarize light become more contrasted and brighter, but it renders the 4X objective due to uneven illumination.
Attachments
IMG_20210212_115201026.jpg
IMG_20210212_115201026.jpg (28.94 KiB) Viewed 2887 times

dtsh
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:06 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: No tool required?

#9 Post by dtsh » Fri Feb 12, 2021 5:22 pm

Plasmid wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 4:57 pm
I remember reading that ND filters need to be changed from time to time, how does one know when the filter is shot? And is there any other alternatives out there as in different opaque levels and or other filters lile lambda or retarder plates that can be used?

After removing the ND filter the images under polarize light become more contrasted and brighter, but it renders the 4X objective due to uneven illumination.
Sounds to me like the ND is dispersing the light some. I know some microscopes (AO for example) use an auxiliary lens to change the cone of light for lower power objectives, that might be an option.
auxiliary_lens.jpg
auxiliary_lens.jpg (93.87 KiB) Viewed 2875 times

Plasmid
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:34 am
Location: North GA
Contact:

Re: No tool required?

#10 Post by Plasmid » Fri Feb 12, 2021 7:33 pm

Aahhh yes , I have one of those 1087 in a drawer somewhere, thank you will report back.

Post Reply