objective comparison

Everything relating to microscopy hardware: Objectives, eyepieces, lamps and more.
Post Reply
Message
Author
henryr
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:29 pm

objective comparison

#1 Post by henryr » Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:16 pm

Is one of these objectives considered optically better and why? Leitz PL 40/0.65 170/0.17 vs Leitz NPL 40/0.65 170/0.17.

Thanks,
henryr

EYE C U
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 5:18 pm

Re: objective comparison

#2 Post by EYE C U » Fri Jan 22, 2021 2:06 am

............................
Last edited by EYE C U on Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

ScienceMatters
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 1:46 am

Re: objective comparison

#3 Post by ScienceMatters » Fri Jan 22, 2021 5:22 am

Regular Leitz achromats: Planar to 18 mm field of view.
NPL = Normal Plan: Planar to 20 mm? field of view, e.g. SM-LUX.
Pl: Planar to 28 mm field of view, e.g. Orthoplan.

MicroBob
Posts: 3154
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 9:11 am
Location: Northern Germany

Re: objective comparison

#4 Post by MicroBob » Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:28 am

Hi together,
I think the Leitz standards of "planar" have changed over the years so the genereation of objective has to be taken into account. The first planar objective series from about 1960 consisted of fairly plain looking objectives with highly reflective chrome. This was pre-Orthoplan, so no need for extremely wide fields. I think when the Orthoplan came out there still were objectives in this look but for wide fields. The later objectives had a rotatable collar with the objective label. I'm not able to give exact values for every objective but for some types:

NPL means near planar, but by Orthoplan standards! This was plan over 24mm field. But it didn't mean fluorite. But there were NPL Fluotars, which were fluorites.
PLAN means planar by Orthoplan standards, 28mm

The objectives of the last finity type were available in 170mm and 160mm labeling. I have a pair of these ant they are the same in this case.

Bob

Post Reply