.
revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=13181&p
Stauroneis angustilancea 85µm and 2 diatoms in Girdle view at 65µm and 40µm that could be Eunotia sp.
Corrections as always are welcome ...
Zeiss Planapo 63x/1.4, DIC, stacked in Photoshop, camera set to Monotone
.
revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
- Attachments
-
- Stauroneis angustilancea 85µm-.jpg (139.22 KiB) Viewed 3806 times
-
- Eunotia sp. Girdle view 65µm.jpg (145.46 KiB) Viewed 3806 times
-
- Eunotia sp. Girdle view 40µm- .jpg (158.57 KiB) Viewed 3806 times
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Re: revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
Beautiful photos!
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
I love a nice hi-res diatom! Any chance of a link to larger versions?
Happy New Year!
Louise
Happy New Year!
Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo
Re: revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
.
Thanks tlansing and LouiseScot
Pretty close to empty magnification at this size
.
Thanks tlansing and LouiseScot
Don't have any but made a bigger jpeg version from the original 45 image stack TIFF of the Eunotia 65µm.Any chance of a link to larger versions?
Pretty close to empty magnification at this size
.
- Attachments
-
- Bigger.jpg (145 KiB) Viewed 3730 times
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Re: revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
All are very nice, and indeed the latter ("Bigger") Eunotia shows even better contrast and resolution than the former ! I enlarged them many folds to inspect...
Re: revisiting Diatomeen Ugchelen 6
.
Many thanks Hobbyst46,
Have gone back to the Projektiv 63mm which I am now trying to fine tune.
Given that my camera, due to its excess vibration is on a tripod, and as I don't have a permanent spot for my microscope at the moment (it hot-bunks desk space with my monitor and keyboard),
means that using a Projection eyepiece (no lens on the camera) entails setting up the camera at the correct parfocal distance every time I use the microscope.
This is as you can imagine, a little hit and miss.
The advantage of the Projectiv 63mm which is afocal (requiring a camera lens) is that it transmits a parallel beam, so setting up the camera is painless and consistent, once the Projectiv is dialed in.
Will just have to live with the hot-spot for now.
Many thanks Hobbyst46,
Have gone back to the Projektiv 63mm which I am now trying to fine tune.
Given that my camera, due to its excess vibration is on a tripod, and as I don't have a permanent spot for my microscope at the moment (it hot-bunks desk space with my monitor and keyboard),
means that using a Projection eyepiece (no lens on the camera) entails setting up the camera at the correct parfocal distance every time I use the microscope.
This is as you can imagine, a little hit and miss.
The advantage of the Projectiv 63mm which is afocal (requiring a camera lens) is that it transmits a parallel beam, so setting up the camera is painless and consistent, once the Projectiv is dialed in.
Will just have to live with the hot-spot for now.
Zeiss Standard WL (somewhat fashion challenged) & Wild M8
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)
Olympus E-P2 (Micro Four Thirds Camera)