Two thin sections of local rocks
Re: Two thin sections of local rocks
How thin were you able to go with your rock sections? I worked with some amber sections but a lot softer material, even though a lot of time with primitive means.
Rodney
Rodney
Re: Two thin sections of local rocks
The rock thin sections, including the epoxy mountant, are 80-90 microns thick.
I made a thin section of sulphur as an experiment. The slice started out about 20mm thick and ended up approx. 110mm on the slide.
With soft material I finish them off by hand on 1200-1500 grit wet/dry emery paper.
I put a velcro dot on the slide and use a rubber finger to move the slide around on the emery paper.
I made a thin section of sulphur as an experiment. The slice started out about 20mm thick and ended up approx. 110mm on the slide.
With soft material I finish them off by hand on 1200-1500 grit wet/dry emery paper.
I put a velcro dot on the slide and use a rubber finger to move the slide around on the emery paper.
Re: Two thin sections of local rocks
Oh ok good work with hard rock samples, I think as far as I ever took it was 1000 grit automotive wet sand paper working with amber, other than my rock crusher working with rock particles.
Rodney
Rodney
Re: Two thin sections of local rocks
If you can crush rocks fine enough to pass through a 100 mesh screen, then you can cement the crushed rock to a glass slide. The process is called comminution.
The slide can be viewed with a polarizing microscope.
McCrone mineral set
The slide can be viewed with a polarizing microscope.
McCrone mineral set
Re: Two thin sections of local rocks
I have a rock section I would like you to look at. I think I had it cut with a diamond blade, then I sanded one flat section down and then I used a fine knife sharpening rock with a circular motion of the sample for several hours. While polishing this out I used dish washing liquid in water. I think the rock is actually a fossil of bone. If I can obtain a good picture I may post it in a new topic later for any ones identification or thoughts.
Rodney
Rodney
Re: Two thin sections of local rocks
Rodney:
A slice of rock should be at least 100 microns thin in order to transmit light. Add the thickness of the mount and the minimum thickness for transparency is approx. 125 microns.
The 100 microns is hard to achieve without first polishing one side and then mounting it.
Once mounted you can grind/polish it down. If you hold the mounted specimen up to a light and you can see light through the rock, you are close to transparency.
A slice of rock should be at least 100 microns thin in order to transmit light. Add the thickness of the mount and the minimum thickness for transparency is approx. 125 microns.
The 100 microns is hard to achieve without first polishing one side and then mounting it.
Once mounted you can grind/polish it down. If you hold the mounted specimen up to a light and you can see light through the rock, you are close to transparency.
Re: Two thin sections of local rocks
No qcc it want be anywhere close to 100 microns thin. The purpose of a picture would be just to look at this section with a top light and how unique the patterns look. May take a long time to get this one thin enough for transmitted light.
Rodney
Rodney