Page 1 of 1

Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 12:43 am
by hans
I have been looking at cheek cells quite a bit while setting up various phase contrast stuff I bought over the last few months and notice these fine, fingerprint-like striations sometimes visible. Found this old article while trying to figure out what they were:

George G. Rose, C. M. Pomerat - PHASE CONTRAST OBSERVATIONS OF THE ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM IN LIVING TISSUE CULTURES

Reichert 1744 40/0.66 objective, unfiltered tungsten illumination, converted to black-and-white in RawTherapee using green channel only:

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 6:02 am
by hans
Similar but with the 43X 0.65 achromat on an older B&L Dynoptic:

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 11:55 am
by perrywespa
Impressive! Thanks for sharing.

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 8:56 pm
by hans
Thanks Perry, still not sure whether this is actually ER but it shows some interesting patterns. I don't have a 100X phase objective for my Microstar IV and was getting poor results with the 97X on the Dynoptic the first time I tried it. Not sure what I was doing wrong but after some more fiddling with illumination the 97X is working better:

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 5:57 am
by hans
After more searching I believe this is microplicae, fine ridges in the cell surface. They are mentioned as a resolution test subject here:
E.D. Salmon, Phong Tran - Chapter 9 High-Resolution Video-Enhanced Differential Interference Contrast (VE-DIC) Light Microscopy
B. Squamous Cheek Cell
Another resolution test for the video camera and the alignment of the DIC optics are squamous epithelial cells scraped from your cheek (Fig. 10). The preparation is made by scraping the inside of your cheek with the tip of a plastic pipette or similar tool and spreading the cells and saliva on the center of a clean number 1.5 22 X 22-mm coverslip. The coverslip is quickly inverted on a clean slide and pressed down to spread the cell preparation into a thin layer. The edges of the coverslip are sealed with a thin layer of nail polish. As seen in the low magnification view in Fig. 10A, the cheek cells are large and flat with the nucleus in the center. The upper and lower surfaces have fine ridges, which swirl around much like fingerprints. Many of the ridges are diffraction limited in width and separated by about 0.5-1 pm. If the microscope is aligned properly, these ridges should be distinctly visible by eye and appear in high contrast by VE-DIC using high-resolution optics (Fig. 10B). The cheek cells are also a good test for the optical sectioning capabilities of the microscope since they are about 2-3 pm thick near the periphery.
The scale factor based on the scale bar in panel B of figure 10 (as attached below) is 55 nm/pixel and for comparison the scale factor in the photo with the B&L 97X in the previous post should be 60 nm/pixel. (Calculated, not actually calibrated with a stage micrometer.)

Some freely-downloadable papers with images, mostly SEM:
Microplicae: Characteristic ridge-like folds of the plasmalemma
Microplicae – Specialized Surface Structure of Epithelial Cells of Wet-Surfaced Oral Mucosa
Prenatal Development of Palatal Surface Structures
Scanning Electron Microscopy in Oral Mucosal Research: A Review

And a search on Science Photo Library returns some pretty results: https://www.sciencephoto.com/search?q=microplicae

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:44 pm
by perrywespa
That explanation makes more sense. It's been many years since I studied cell anatomy but I don't remember ER taking up that much volume in the cell. Could be wrong, though.

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2021 1:16 am
by hans
perrywespa wrote:
Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:44 pm
It's been many years since I studied cell anatomy...
Better than never (unless high school biology counts), I'm just image-searching and guessing...

I looked at some fresh ones paying more attention to depth and it does seem like the structure is very thin and near the surface. That would explain why they are often not obviously visible -- unless a cell ends up with a relatively large surface area to parallel with the cover glass only a narrow strip is in focus at once and the overall structure is not apparent.

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2022 7:52 pm
by Lomonaut
It's so nice that you noticed them too! I saw these 'wrinkles' in cheek cells and couldn't find what it was.

I'm surprised you could see them with a nA 0.66 objective, I really needed my 100x oil for this!

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2022 10:04 pm
by hans
Yeah, they are not always visible, or maybe not all cells have them over large areas? I looked through quite a few cells to find the examples above where the fingerprint-like pattern is visible and in focus simultaneously over a relatively large area.

I measured roughly 500 nm spacing between the ridges in the photo with the 97X B&L oil objective so theoretically still resolvable with the 40X 0.66 where λ/2*NA is a little over 400 nm. There is some contrast enhancement coming from the tone curve I used converting to black and white, this is what the first one looks like using the default "neutral" profile in RawTherapee:
P1080156-neutral.jpg
P1080156-neutral.jpg (121.78 KiB) Viewed 3905 times
(The magenta color in the over-exposed areas in an artifact from RawTherapee that I never noticed with my older camera and haven't looked into yet.)

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2022 10:29 pm
by Lomonaut
Nice! Yes, the pattern is clearly visible.

But your image with that 97x rules supreme :)

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2022 11:49 am
by nastur74
I think reticulum only can be seen under electron microscope. The areas where some strangers lines appear seems to be folded parts of the own cell. The part of the cell without foldings has not these structures. ER only is 7 nm width

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2022 8:32 pm
by hans
Yeah, I think Lomonaut and I were seeing microplicae as described in the papers linked in post #5. The photos in the 1960 paper linked in the first post are the only examples I found claiming to show the endoplasmic reticulum with phase contrast. I couldn't access the 1958 paper by Fawcett and Ito they cite:
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was first observed by Porter et al. (1) in thinly spread tissue cultured cells viewed with the electron microscope (EM). With the improvement of EM preparation procedures, numerous reports have followed and have indicated the potentially universal occurrence of this cytoplasmic membranous system in animal cells. Since these reports have resulted only from EM analyses, the endoplasmic reticulum, generally, has been considered a component of submicroscopic size. However, a recent observation by Fawcett and Ito (2) demonstrated that phase contrast images observed in freshly isolated testicular cells were equivalent to EM profiles of the endoplasmic reticulum, and thus removed this organelle from the exclusive realm of submicroscopic analysis.

By the use of an innovation of the tissue culture technique (3), we have observed, in cells of one fetal-lung and two malignant-tissue cultures, structures which appear in every respect to be equivalent to the endoplasmic reticulum as reported by Fawcett and Ito in their phase contrast photographs. Although these structures were not proved by EM techniques to be the endoplasmic reticulum, their relationship to the form and size described by Fawcett and Ito and their location in the endoplasm, indicate that there can be little doubt as to their identity.

Re: Endoplasmic reticulum visible with phase contrast?

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:56 pm
by nastur74
I had never heard of microplicae before, but after surfing the internet I agree with you. The structure is similar to that of the inner membrane of the mitochondria, with different functions depending on the type of cell where they are found