MicrobeHunter.com Microscopy Forum

Hello everyone,

This time radiolarians in transmitted light:

20x


20x


3D


CAUTION: The original images have been modified!

Best, ADi

Wonderful! When I was a student, long ago, I cut out pictures like these and glued them to the cupboard door for their beauty. I don't think they were real then, but glass models. When I left that room I had to pay the landlord dearly, for the glue wouldn't come off...

The stereo version doesn't work too well for me.

I cut out pictures like these and glued them to the cupboard door

When I left that room I had to pay the landlord dearly, for the glue wouldn't come off.

The stereo version doesn't work too well for me.

please try to view it from a long distance

BTW, I use a cheap red/blue glasses from ebay and it works for me

Great images !

I'm seeing the stacking not coping.
Great subjects.

Hobbyst46 wrote: ↑

Sat May 27, 2023 6:26 pm

Great images !

Many thanks !

Phill Brown wrote: ↑

Sat May 27, 2023 8:49 pm

I'm seeing the stacking not coping.
Great subjects.

the last photo is in 3D for the glasses red cyan

Beautiful work

macnmotion wrote: ↑

Sun May 28, 2023 10:01 am

Beautiful work

Thank you !

ADi wrote: ↑

Sun May 28, 2023 8:42 am

Phill Brown wrote: ↑

Sat May 27, 2023 8:49 pm

I'm seeing the stacking not coping.
Great subjects.

the last photo is in 3D for the glasses red cyan

In the first picture the centre subject has some details that look like the software struggles to keep the form.
It's possible that reducing the intensity of the lighting as with deep space objects could give the software less glare to deal with.
It's only as I'm seeing it from looking at many diatoms and Radiolarians in DF, if you are confident it's reproducing the form and structure accurately all is well and my views should be disregarded.
Maybe just disregard anyway as they are still excellent.
Keep up the great work.

Phill Brown wrote: ↑

Sun May 28, 2023 9:50 pm

In the first picture the centre subject has some details that look like the software struggles to keep the form.

I see what you mean, Phill

Although the images in general are wonderful … that one does seem to have an ‘ambiguous’ region
… I think the structural detail is sufficiently crowded that the software is struggling to distinguish front from back.
… the simpler shapes do not suffer in the same way, so their volumetric form is more easily seen.

MichaelG.

It's possible a polariser could help the process.
Would also be very interested to see some of the original images before processing,
Some remaining D.O.F can give a sense of form.
Still hoping 3D makes a comeback sometime, as the original system using LCD glasses was created with a single lens endoscope with an LCD shutter that split the left/right it would work with a microscope objective.
I built the prototype electronics some 25 years ago,Sony ended up with the patent but 4k won the race so far.
Easier to sell resolution to someone standing Infront of a large screen in a showroom maybe.

Hi Phill, hi Michael,
Yes, I know what you mean.
The solution would be the retouching with the sub-stacks.
Best, ADi