DSLR issue

Here you can discuss everything related to taking light micrographs and videos.
Message
Author
LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

DSLR issue

#1 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 3:56 pm

I have to admit I'm out of practice with photomicrography, but I was trying out a 40x/0.85 inf pan fluor lens on the Amscope T720 using a diatom strew. It's set up to use my Canon 1100d (Rebel T3) for imaging. Everything is ok except that my images seem to be coming out with a violet/purple colour cast. The T720 uses LED lighting and I thought it might be to do with that. Neither 'Auto' or the other built-in white balance options gave good results. So I thought I'd try a custom colour balance which I did via Liveview. But the output still came out with a violet tinge. It must be something obvious! But not sure what. I tried with a 10x pan fluor but about the same. Any ideas, suggestions?
Here is a crop from the 40x:
IMG_00013_PF40x_CustomCrop.jpg
IMG_00013_PF40x_CustomCrop.jpg (105.94 KiB) Viewed 4115 times
Or is it just my eyes??

Thanks for any input :)

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

Scarodactyl
Posts: 2775
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:09 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#2 Post by Scarodactyl » Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:47 pm

I don't see a violet tinge, just typical axial CA. Could it be that your monitor has gotten off calibration?

User avatar
Wes
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:58 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#3 Post by Wes » Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:52 pm

What projection method do you use? Afocal or direct projection?
Zeiss Photomicroscope III BF/DF/Pol/Ph/DIC/FL/Jamin-Lebedeff
Youtube channel

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#4 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:56 pm

Scarodactyl wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:47 pm
I don't see a violet tinge, just typical axial CA. Could it be that your monitor has gotten off calibration?
Hi

Um what is 'axial CA' ? It's actually not an all-over tinge - just in certain places like the flat area in the centre of the central diatom.
It seems to be independent of the monitor. Here is a crop of the crop with increased saturation enhancing violet and green
IMG_00013_PF40x_CustomCropCrop.jpg
IMG_00013_PF40x_CustomCropCrop.jpg (44.46 KiB) Viewed 4097 times
Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#5 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:58 pm

Wes wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:52 pm
What projection method do you use? Afocal or direct projection?
It's an infinity microscope so direct projection after the tube lens. I'm not sure whether there are any additional optics after the tube lens. The view through the oculars doesn't show any tinge.

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

User avatar
Wes
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:58 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#6 Post by Wes » Sat Sep 17, 2022 5:24 pm

Thats interesting, I thought direct projection largely eliminates CA, not sure about axial CA tho. You can eliminate the magenta and greens with photo editing software but I suspect you want to eliminate it at the source.
Zeiss Photomicroscope III BF/DF/Pol/Ph/DIC/FL/Jamin-Lebedeff
Youtube channel

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#7 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 5:41 pm

Wes wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 5:24 pm
Thats interesting, I thought direct projection largely eliminates CA, not sure about axial CA tho. You can eliminate the magenta and greens with photo editing software but I suspect you want to eliminate it at the source.
Yeah, I wasn't expecting CA with a hq plan fluor but the fact that I don't see any via the oculars made me think it was the camera. Alternatively, maybe the Amscope tube lens isn't so good? Hmm... Or is there an extra lens in the trinocular optical pathway? I actually removed the original trinocular tube because it wasn't any good for connecting a dslr. Maybe I'll try and connect the camera via an ocular port to see if I can get a better image.

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

Scarodactyl
Posts: 2775
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:09 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#8 Post by Scarodactyl » Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:27 pm

LouiseScot wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:56 pm
Hi

Um what is 'axial CA' ?
It's what you're seeing. There are two kinds of chromatic aberration, color separation horizontally (lateral ca) and color separation axially (ie towards or away from your eye). It's typically this purple and green color vs the more classic red blue lateral ca.
Fluorites are often better corrected for lateral than axial ca, and they can vary a lot in quality. It's also possible that the eyepieces and/or tube lens on your scope are compensating to some degree. That would take experimentation to figure out.
Wes wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 5:24 pm
Thats interesting, I thought direct projection largely eliminates CA, not sure about axial CA tho. You can eliminate the magenta and greens with photo editing software but I suspect you want to eliminate it at the source.
On the systems it is appropriate on direct projection mitigates the possibility of extra added CA from relay optics but it doesn't eliminate CA already present in the objective's image. Axial CA is notoriously harder to remove witb software than lateral though that eill vary with the subject.
Last edited by Scarodactyl on Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#9 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:32 pm

Scarodactyl wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:27 pm
LouiseScot wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:56 pm
Scarodactyl wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:47 pm
I don't see a violet tinge, just typical axial CA. Could it be that your monitor has gotten off calibration?
Hi

Um what is 'axial CA' ?
It's what you're seeing. There are two kinds of chromatic aberration, color separation horizontally (lateral ca) and color separation axially (ie towards or away from your eye). It's typically this purple and green color vs the more classic red blue lateral ca.
Fluorites are often better corrected for lateral than axial ca.
Ok but I don't see it when observing via the oculars so it must be something in the camera pathway? I'll do some tests/experiments tomorrow to try and narrow it down.
Thanks
Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4277
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#10 Post by Hobbyst46 » Sat Sep 17, 2022 7:50 pm

I believe it is the LED light.
Occasionally I observed my diatom slides under halogen light, and there were no purple fringes.
Under my current LED, there are fringes, especially under oblique light. I will try and post an example.

But, diatoms are not the best demonstrators of CA. The diatom frustule does all funny things with light - scattering, refraction, dispersion etc. When in doubt, I would suggest to inspect the simplest target - a stage micrometer. There, CA - if present - is obvious.

Hobbyst46
Posts: 4277
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#11 Post by Hobbyst46 » Sat Sep 17, 2022 8:12 pm

Here is an example.
The same diatom was imaged with a plain (non phase contrast) 40X0.75 Neofluar objective.
Afocal photography, my previous 6500K LED light, filtered through a KR12 amber filter (my present light is 4000K, high CR LED).
One image is brightfield, the other oblique.
Both images were considerably cropped. Also done - slight tweaking of the brightness and contrast, simultaneously on both photos.
Attachments
40X0.75 Neofluar, BF, white light - Diatom 2.JPG
40X0.75 Neofluar, BF, white light - Diatom 2.JPG (102.06 KiB) Viewed 4039 times
40X0.75 Neofluar, OBL, white light.JPG
40X0.75 Neofluar, OBL, white light.JPG (113.9 KiB) Viewed 4039 times

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#12 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:15 pm

Hobbyst46 wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 7:50 pm
I believe it is the LED light.
Occasionally I observed my diatom slides under halogen light, and there were no purple fringes.
Under my current LED, there are fringes, especially under oblique light. I will try and post an example.

But, diatoms are not the best demonstrators of CA. The diatom frustule does all funny things with light - scattering, refraction, dispersion etc. When in doubt, I would suggest to inspect the simplest target - a stage micrometer. There, CA - if present - is obvious.
Hiya
The LED illumination certainly could be a factor. But I still wonder why it only shows up on camera images and not when viewing via the oculars. The T720 has Kohler so the illumination should be even. Having said that, I'll have to checkout my trinocular adapter to make sure the camera sensor is aligned. I'll also have a look via the trinocular with an eyepiece.
Thanks
Louise
ps hope you are well
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

User avatar
imkap
Posts: 750
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:44 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#13 Post by imkap » Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:21 pm

LouiseScot wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:15 pm
Hiya
The LED illumination certainly could be a factor. But I still ....
My camera too registers more CA than I do. Try fiddling with white balance a bit.

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#14 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:25 pm

Hobbyst46 wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 8:12 pm
Here is an example.
The same diatom was imaged with a plain (non phase contrast) 40X0.75 Neofluar objective.
Afocal photography, my previous 6500K LED light, filtered through a KR12 amber filter (my present light is 4000K, high CR LED).
One image is brightfield, the other oblique.
Both images were considerably cropped. Also done - slight tweaking of the brightness and contrast, simultaneously on both photos.
Yep, that's pretty much the same as I'm getting on my images. I know what you mean about diatom-induced aberrations! I wasn't looking for it - I was just checking out the 40x/0.85 plan fluor I got from China (at relatively great expense!). So was having a critical look at the image quality and resolution. I did set up scale bars yesterday and didn't notice any CA on the micrometer slide image. It's on another computer but will post an image of it tomorrow.

Thanks

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#15 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:26 pm

imkap wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:21 pm
LouiseScot wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:15 pm
Hiya
The LED illumination certainly could be a factor. But I still ....
My camera too registers more CA than I do. Try fiddling with white balance a bit.
Hiya

Um, see my original post! :)

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

Scarodactyl
Posts: 2775
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:09 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#16 Post by Scarodactyl » Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:55 pm

It's interesting that the violet color stood oit to you but not the equal and opposite green also present in tbe imagr. There might still be a screen issue of some sort that's making that color more apparent.

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#17 Post by LouiseScot » Sat Sep 17, 2022 10:43 pm

Scarodactyl wrote:
Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:55 pm
It's interesting that the violet color stood oit to you but not the equal and opposite green also present in tbe imagr. There might still be a screen issue of some sort that's making that color more apparent.
Ah, there was more green too, originally, but that lessened after I did the custom white balance. The white balance was why I posted in the first place because I thought the issues were down to the Canon 1100d. Further experimentation and tests required!

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

MicroBob
Posts: 3154
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 9:11 am
Location: Northern Germany

Re: DSLR issue

#18 Post by MicroBob » Sun Sep 18, 2022 1:10 am

Is your camera parfocal with the eyepieces?

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#19 Post by LouiseScot » Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:14 am

MicroBob wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 1:10 am
Is your camera parfocal with the eyepieces?
Almost! Though I fine focus the camera image via the laptop screen anyway :) I'll be having a closer look at things today.

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

MicroBob
Posts: 3154
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 9:11 am
Location: Northern Germany

Re: DSLR issue

#20 Post by MicroBob » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:28 am

In case it is far from parfocal you use the objective with the wrong distance to the object. In some cases not much happens, in other cases the image suffers a lot.

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#21 Post by LouiseScot » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:49 am

MicroBob wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:28 am
In case it is far from parfocal you use the objective with the wrong distance to the object. In some cases not much happens, in other cases the image suffers a lot.
Hi

I did some fine tuning earlier to make sure the camera sensor is as parfocal with the oculars as possible. It was very close anyway.
I've done some other checks and found that I could see the purple aberration in some places by using a 25x EP which naturally gave a bigger image of the diatom I'd centred on (40 x 25 = 1000). I get the same effect with the EP positioned above the trinocular path. So, it's either intrinsic to the microscope/objective (rather than anything to do with the camera) or it's an artifact of the particular slide/diatom. I'll try some other slides and double check the micrometer image!

Thanks

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#22 Post by LouiseScot » Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:05 pm

A quick update! (where does all the time go??) Anyway, I decided to try the 40x plan fluor on my DIY rail system. However, that was somewhat in pieces as I'd been working on an epi-illuminator for it :). The rail setup generally still needs some, erm, enhancements etc. but is just about useable. It's essentially monocular but with either EP or camera attached. It's fitted with a Fujifilm X-T30 APS-C mirrorless camera, and which is 22-26 MPixels with 3.74 um pixels.
A first try seems to show a little less CA than on the AmScope T720 with the Canon:

DSCF0179CropResize67pcCrop100pc.jpg
DSCF0179CropResize67pcCrop100pc.jpg (34.05 KiB) Viewed 3420 times

Maybe less green with the Fuji/rail?

I can't easily tell how much is due to the differences between cameras and/or microscopes. I can fit a 40x CFI60 Plan Fluor and/or a 20x CFI60 plan Apo to the rail nosepiece so will compare them when I get a chance.

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

Scarodactyl
Posts: 2775
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:09 pm

Re: DSLR issue

#23 Post by Scarodactyl » Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:59 pm

That does look significantly better!

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#24 Post by LouiseScot » Fri Oct 14, 2022 5:12 pm

Scarodactyl wrote:
Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:59 pm
That does look significantly better!
I confess I did to some peak alignment in levels though I did the same with T720 image anyway. I'll post again, when I can, with some comparisons using the Nikons.
Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#25 Post by LouiseScot » Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:40 am

Here are a couple of images I took using the Nikon CFI60 40x/0.75 Plan Fluor on the DIY rail with the Fuji X-T30. I have some issues with the rail in that it's hypersensitive to movement especially since I moved it to a different location in my living room. Needs some fettling and engineering. I might try moving it again - it might just be a floorboards issue! Anyway, I think the images have come out pretty much the same as the Chinese 40x/0.75 Plan Fluor. Some purple fringing but little green on my DIY rail system with LED lighting. My conclusion is that the Chinese 40x plan fluor is ok but the issues I thought I had on the AmScope T720 / Canon DSLR could possibly be intrinsic to the T720 stand optics - I'm not sure how much the tube lens might contribute.
DSCF0204Crop3.jpg
DSCF0204Crop3.jpg (51.05 KiB) Viewed 3300 times
DSCF0199Cropb.jpg
DSCF0199Cropb.jpg (37.82 KiB) Viewed 3300 times

The above pics are heavily cropped from the original 6240 x 3512 frames so pushing the limits. I'm expecting a Chinese UPlanFLN 100x/1.30 in the post soon - better for high resolution sharpness!

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

apochronaut
Posts: 6272
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am

Re: DSLR issue

#26 Post by apochronaut » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:05 pm

Should have bought the Indian planF. You would have saved a fair amount of cash, too.

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#27 Post by LouiseScot » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:16 pm

apochronaut wrote:
Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:05 pm
Should have bought the Indian planF. You would have saved a fair amount of cash, too.
I'm happy with the Chinese one. The Nikon is good too. I wouldn't have bought the Chinese one if I could have fitted the Nikon on the AmScope.

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#28 Post by LouiseScot » Tue Oct 18, 2022 12:41 pm

I set up a halogen bulb and took some images with the Nikon CFI60 40x just to compare:
DSCF0209Crop2Adj.jpg
DSCF0209Crop2Adj.jpg (50.05 KiB) Viewed 3215 times
Using tungsten halogen illumination definitely changes things a bit! It was a 12v 30W bulb which I actually ran at just over 6V so gave a very warm image. I could have run it at 12V but didn't want things to get too hot!
Anyway, I did some peak aligning and the above was the result.

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

ldflan
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed May 22, 2019 11:36 pm
Location: Morna Moruna

Re: DSLR issue

#29 Post by ldflan » Tue Oct 18, 2022 6:58 pm

I was thinking as I read through the series of posts that your LED and not the DSLR is probably a major culprit here. They often have been for me...

LouiseScot
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:51 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: DSLR issue

#30 Post by LouiseScot » Tue Oct 18, 2022 9:17 pm

ldflan wrote:
Tue Oct 18, 2022 6:58 pm
I was thinking as I read through the series of posts that your LED and not the DSLR is probably a major culprit here. They often have been for me...
Hobbyst46 suggested that in #10 and #11. I'm not completely convinced and I don't exactly understand why it would be. But I'm not ruling it out! I'll try the halogen in the AmScope 720 when I have time later in the week. I see some current Nikon scopes use halogens, others use LED. I wonder if it's the particular LED that can make a difference?

Thanks

Louise
A Nikon CF plan 20x; A Swift 380T; A DIY infinity corrected focus rail system with a 40x/0.65 Olympus Plan, a 10x/0.30 Amscope Plan Fluor, and a 20x/0.75 Nikon Plan Apo

Post Reply