First time I ever meet this critter. It resembles Paranassula but not all its features match.
Any idea about ID? Thank you!
Lovely unknown Nassulid with a nice cyrtos
Lovely unknown Nassulid with a nice cyrtos
My own Micrographia:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Eu6v ... wIznWeiLIw
https://www.tiktok.com/@el.geologo.moderno
Meet me on TV:
https://youtu.be/BgWoG8UYrjo (Spanish with transcrit and subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Eu6v ... wIznWeiLIw
https://www.tiktok.com/@el.geologo.moderno
Meet me on TV:
https://youtu.be/BgWoG8UYrjo (Spanish with transcrit and subtitles)
Re: Lovely unknown Nassulid with a nice cyrtos
I'm narrowing my search. Now I think it could be Nassula aurea or more probably Nassula gracilis.
I hope experts can correct me.
I hope experts can correct me.
My own Micrographia:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Eu6v ... wIznWeiLIw
https://www.tiktok.com/@el.geologo.moderno
Meet me on TV:
https://youtu.be/BgWoG8UYrjo (Spanish with transcrit and subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Eu6v ... wIznWeiLIw
https://www.tiktok.com/@el.geologo.moderno
Meet me on TV:
https://youtu.be/BgWoG8UYrjo (Spanish with transcrit and subtitles)
-
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 11:34 am
Re: Lovely unknown Nassulid with a nice cyrtos
Very nice!
Paranassula is a marine genus, I believe (and not a nassulid, oddly! It is currently considered a peniculid, like Paramecium).
Nassula aurea is now in the genus Obertrumia. That genus is differentiated from other nassulids by a small difference in a structure called the "hypostomial frange," which in Nassula is continuous and in Obertrumia is in two parts. Overall, O. aurea has a very different shape, without the anterior constriction we see here (it is typically a rather plump ciliate, and broader in the anterior than the posterior). I'm quite sure this isn't O. aurea.
As far as I know, N. gracilis has not been redescribed since Kahl's description in 1931. Your ciliate doesn't have a distinct pigment spot, as reported for N. gracilis, and it lacks the slight "beak" mentioned & depicted by Kahl. The cell shape does not strike me as similar.
I think this is likely a species of Nassulopsis (which, I'm sorry to say, is not a nassulid but a synhymeniid, like Chilodontopsis and Zosterodasys ). That genus is characterized by an oblique hypostomial frange which goes all the way around the cell. We don't really see the frange, here, but we the overall appearance of the cell is consistent with that genus. However, we don't see the number and distribution of contractile vacuoles clearly, and pigment granules don't seem to be concentrated in the anterior (forming a distinct blue or purple spot). So, I'm not completely sure! If you see them again, try to get a look at the frange...if it goes all the way across the cell, Nassulopsis is likely.
(Another possibility is Zosterodasys henarensis, a synhymeniid with a distinctly constricted anterior region, originally found in the Henares river, in Spain. However, according to Vdacny & Tirjakova, "The generic home of this species is doubtful because of the Nassulopsis-like body shape.")
Paranassula is a marine genus, I believe (and not a nassulid, oddly! It is currently considered a peniculid, like Paramecium).
Nassula aurea is now in the genus Obertrumia. That genus is differentiated from other nassulids by a small difference in a structure called the "hypostomial frange," which in Nassula is continuous and in Obertrumia is in two parts. Overall, O. aurea has a very different shape, without the anterior constriction we see here (it is typically a rather plump ciliate, and broader in the anterior than the posterior). I'm quite sure this isn't O. aurea.
As far as I know, N. gracilis has not been redescribed since Kahl's description in 1931. Your ciliate doesn't have a distinct pigment spot, as reported for N. gracilis, and it lacks the slight "beak" mentioned & depicted by Kahl. The cell shape does not strike me as similar.
I think this is likely a species of Nassulopsis (which, I'm sorry to say, is not a nassulid but a synhymeniid, like Chilodontopsis and Zosterodasys ). That genus is characterized by an oblique hypostomial frange which goes all the way around the cell. We don't really see the frange, here, but we the overall appearance of the cell is consistent with that genus. However, we don't see the number and distribution of contractile vacuoles clearly, and pigment granules don't seem to be concentrated in the anterior (forming a distinct blue or purple spot). So, I'm not completely sure! If you see them again, try to get a look at the frange...if it goes all the way across the cell, Nassulopsis is likely.
(Another possibility is Zosterodasys henarensis, a synhymeniid with a distinctly constricted anterior region, originally found in the Henares river, in Spain. However, according to Vdacny & Tirjakova, "The generic home of this species is doubtful because of the Nassulopsis-like body shape.")
Re: Lovely unknown Nassulid with a nice cyrtos
After this doctoral dissertation I can only say THANK YOU!
Unfortunately, this critter has not shown again. I think we have to wait for next season to arrive before getting to know its real ID.
Notwithstanding this, I stay alert. The amateur protozoologist never sleeps.
A thousand thanks, Bruce!
Unfortunately, this critter has not shown again. I think we have to wait for next season to arrive before getting to know its real ID.
Notwithstanding this, I stay alert. The amateur protozoologist never sleeps.
A thousand thanks, Bruce!
My own Micrographia:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Eu6v ... wIznWeiLIw
https://www.tiktok.com/@el.geologo.moderno
Meet me on TV:
https://youtu.be/BgWoG8UYrjo (Spanish with transcrit and subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Eu6v ... wIznWeiLIw
https://www.tiktok.com/@el.geologo.moderno
Meet me on TV:
https://youtu.be/BgWoG8UYrjo (Spanish with transcrit and subtitles)