I'm not exactly sure of the era of the objectives, probably from about the first W.W. to the early 50's but the design is a split shroud, with a lens section below a knurled ring and a blank section with rear baffle only above it. You unthread the baffle section and replace it with the iris as an adjustable baffle.
The old ones were brass above and likely palladium plate below. In the 30's they changed to a shinier metal plate, for both sections. Maybe chrome but possibly some other non reactive metal.
I'm a bit busy for a few days but by Sunday I can probably take a couple of pictures of one. I may have both types. Send me a p.m. early in the week and jog my memory, if I don't get it done. Planting, these days.
Dark field illumination: Questions and answers
-
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am
-
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am
Re: Dark field illumination: Questions and answers
The iris works on any of the higher N.A. objectives above anout 60X.
Re: Dark field illumination: Questions and answers
Thanks for that, I found some examples what you’re talking about online.apochronaut wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:17 amI'm not exactly sure of the era of the objectives, probably from about the first W.W. to the early 50's but the design is a split shroud, with a lens section below a knurled ring and a blank section with rear baffle only above it. You unthread the baffle section and replace it with the iris as an adjustable baffle.
The old ones were brass above and likely palladium plate below. In the 30's they changed to a shinier metal plate, for both sections. Maybe chrome but possibly some other non reactive metal.
I'm a bit busy for a few days but by Sunday I can probably take a couple of pictures of one. I may have both types. Send me a p.m. early in the week and jog my memory, if I don't get it done. Planting, these days.
-
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am
Re: Dark field illumination: Questions and answers
Here are some photos, as well.
- Attachments
-
- upper section of a 1/12" 1.30 objective and the alternative iris section
- DSC03197 (1280x719).jpg (126.17 KiB) Viewed 4288 times
-
- rear diaphragms of a 1/12" upper objective section left and the iris section on the right. They date from about the same time.
- DSC03198 (1280x719).jpg (146.18 KiB) Viewed 4288 times
-
- iris section next to a contemporary 1/12 " 1.30 N.A. objective
- DSC03196 (1280x719).jpg (126.53 KiB) Viewed 4288 times
-
- iris section fitted to a very old 7 objective, probably about 15 to 20 years prior.
- DSC03199 (719x1280).jpg (135.29 KiB) Viewed 4288 times
-
- iris section fitted to a more modern 62X objective marked 7 but also 62X. it was made about 20 years later. the N.A. is not marked but it performs as about a .85, probably a little too high for the D.F. condenser.
- DSC03201 (719x1280).jpg (108.59 KiB) Viewed 4288 times
Re: Dark field illumination: Questions and answers
Thanks for getting back to me on that, I’m watching a few on the evil auction site.
-
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 12:15 am
Re: Dark field illumination: Questions and answers
There are usually subtle changes in the objectives made between about 1910 and 1960, even though the actual optical designs varied little. Mostly, the advent of anti-reflection coatings and very minor changes to internal design of the barrel reduced flare a little and increased contrast. If I had a choice, I would probably aim for a silver barreled one, from the 40's or 50's but even the early Leitz objectives I have tried out are very good.